• oktux@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    The problem is that almost no one uses PGP, as this vice article points out: https://www.vice.com/en/article/vvbw9a/even-the-inventor-of-pgp-doesnt-use-pgp

    If your goal is secure communication with other tech-savvy, privacy conscious people, then I agree that PGP is a reliable, time tested solution.

    But if your goal is to keep email providers from data mining your inbox, then Proton is an easy way to do that, no matter who you’re communicating with.

    • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      How can proton protect your unencrypted emails? Unless you are writing someone that also uses protonmail or pgp, the emails wont be encrypted. This is barely an advantage at all over the existing system. You are just telling people to depend on this single point of failure, which is proton.

      You cant expect everyone to use protonmail, that would be unwise from a decentralization standpoint. The real solution is only using email for people that are unwilling or unable to use something other than email. For everyone else you should simply switch to different communications protocols that were made with e2ee in mind.