• TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I feel like warning people about bad actors is a public service that should be encouraged. If you saw the user’s interactions with me you might agree with my theory too. But since you can’t even say what I did, Lemmy literally can and will be used as a tool for election interference, with no recourse at all

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          That sounds nice and all, but what evidence can I provide? Are you really going to read 10+ comments and make a judgment call? There are at least 2 people I’ve seen just lie and lie to their heart’s content and today my messages calling them out resulted in mod actions against me.

          Just saying “you are lying and I think it’s because you’re being paid to” is enough to get me banned/deleted all over the place. Kinda sucks that in this way it’s like Facebook here (calling out people being shitty gets punished at times). To be clear, I think Lemmy is far better than a network like FB but at the same time I really wish we could ditch all the bad parts of places like that.

          • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            If someone reports as “Seems like this is a bad actor”, yeah, that’s exactly what we do. We also have two back channel chats, one with the other mods and the lemmy.world admins and another with admins of multiple lemmy instances.

            If we determine that what they are doing may not necessarily violate the rules, it elevates their user name to a point where we are all now watching them.

            I will typically reply and engage with them to see how bad they really are, sometimes that’s enough for them to peel back the mask and get then banned.

            • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Okay. Just curious, would it qualify as suspicious if a user repeatedly says others “support genocide” without them ever once uttering such a thing? The two users I’m talking about will throw that out every single time someone disagrees with their views about Israel. That kind of wackadoo shit, along with lying to make trump look better, and other dishonest claims unrelated to anything else.

              • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                Oh, I know EXACTLY who you’re talking about. :)

                That doesn’t make them bots or bad actors. They’re allowed to have bad opinions.

                Where we draw the line is attacking other users. If they’re saying YOU’RE supporting genocide, that’s a civility rule and the comment will get pulled.

                If they say Biden or Harris or anyone else is supporting genocide, that’s clearly not true and a bad opinion but allowed.

                • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  I’m honestly curious though, what would it take for a user to be considered a Russian (or other) troll? Would they need to directly praise trump many times every day? I see some people lying about things Biden has done quite a lot… Would there ever be a threshold where it’s considered obvious that they’re only here to spread misinformation?

                  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    The big one was when Return2Ozma admitted, in public, that they were only interested in posting negative Biden information, that got them a 30 day ban.

                    Barring something like that? It’s subjective. Mods don’t have access to IP information so we can’t directly see if something is, say, coming from a bot farm.

                    The Admins can see that, but with VPNs and such, IP information isn’t 100% reliable either.

                • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 months ago

                  I mean, I’ve been accused of “supporting genocide” 100 times and I’m not aware of a single one of those comments being removed. And I literally have never said a single thing to justify that claim. “Biden can’t control Netanyahu” for example. I know a user who would zero hesitation respond to the that with “you support genocide” and has many times to anything related to Israel that they dislike. Yeah I get opinions shouldn’t be policed but flat out just lying ideally would be.

                  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    The big thing is what gets reported and what doesn’t. Contrary to public opinion, mods aren’t out here reading every comment in every thread.

                    We DO read and review everything that gets reported, and when a comment is reported, it also goes to the admins, both here and on the users home instance.