• Travelers can opt out of facial recognition at US airports by requesting manual ID verification, though resistance or intimidation may occur.
  • Facial recognition poses privacy risks, including potential data breaches, misidentification, and normalization of surveillance.
  • The Algorithmic Justice League’s “Freedom Flyers” campaign aims to raise awareness of these issues and encourage passengers to exercise their right to opt out.
  • Chemical Wonka@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    “Normies” avoiding scanning their face is useless because the vast majority of them still use Instagram and other social media services full of surveillance

    • Emerald@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’ve never posted any pictures of my face online. But I’m sure many data brokers have them. And some family members many years ago I’m sure posted some.

  • AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    The last time I flew they did this, but there was a huge sign that said photos are immediately deleted after verification…is this not true?

    • SulaymanF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s discussed in the article. We can’t really be sure if they do, but they already store the measurements of your face along with other bits of metadata. They could reconstruct your face with it even without the photo. It’s a deceptive claim, because even if they throw away the camera video they still have your face for all intents and purposes.

    • Infinite@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Just for example, that’s an easy way to save just the biometric signature and have very few people question it.

      • jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Also, bureaucratic lies can be technically true. They copy the photo from the original device to a database, then delete the photo on the device. So it’s technically true the photo was immediately deleted, it’s just also copied and persisted forever. And a bureaucrat will proudly stand in front of you all day and tell you they deleted the photo, and they will sleep well that night with not any concern

        • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Judge would declare that unlawful on the spot but without malicious intent whoever did it would have qualified immunity since a judge hasn’t already ruled on that specific case so it’s a wash.

  • StereoTrespasser@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    If you already have a passport and opt out of facial recognition, you’re only deluding yourself into a false sense of privacy. In fact, if you enter the screening area at all in an airport, you are kidding yourself if you think you can maintain some semblance of privacy. The government knows what you look like. Calm down and move on with your life.

    • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I went vacationing in another country and it was kinda uncomfortable being scanned by cameras, then scanning my passport, then moving across country lines and getting cameras and another scanning of my passport.

    • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Fuck calming down. That’s how we got into this mess in the first place. People are to complacent with privacy. Anyone that thinks this attitude won’t lead to terrible things is a fool.

      • huginn@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        You’re never going to live in a world where you’re allowed to fly without photo id amigo.

        • SulaymanF@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          That’s a strawman, who said otherwise? Showing ID is one thing, storing your ID and tracking your trips is another.

            • SulaymanF@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Is that what I said? No. Of course it can be and is tracked. But I’m not going to Hand over my biometrics and make it easier for them.

              • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                Exactly. If they need it, they can issue a lawful order, and that has certain prerequisites here in the US. I’m guessing international airports have special rules, but I’m only going to hand over what I’m legally obligated to and force them to dance around my 4th amendment rights or face a lawsuit.

        • CyaL8r@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          That’s not what the other user is saying - we have to fight to keep what rights we have, and maybe one day gain some of the ones we lost

          • kautau@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Their message is correct but they’re mad at that “calm down” part and addressed it poorly

            User 1: if you fly using a passport, the government knows what you look like, whether or not you opt out of facial recognition, being a Karen at the airport won’t help with you

            User 2: Fuck that, if we are complacent, more privacy will be taken away from us

            User 3: You can’t fly without a photo id

            Seems to me the user you responded to knows what they are saying, and you’re both right. You don’t have a right to fly on an airplane without a legal verification of who you are. We should have a right to verify our identity without facial recognition software. But that happens with laws, not making scenes at airports

            • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Honestly, we should have a right to fly w/o providing ID as well. I don’t need it to ride the bus or local train, and I don’t think I need it for a greyhound bus (if I pay w/ cash). I’ve heard you can maybe get away w/o ID on Amtrak, but their official policy says it’s required.

              So why are airplanes so different? Fatalities per mile on airplanes are among the lowest of any form of transportation, so I highly doubt terrorism is a significant, statistically relevant factor here. I think they do it because they can, not because it actually helps reduce risk in any meaningful way. I don’t see any basis for needing an ID for any form of mass transit, you should only need it for driving to prove that you have the privilege to do so.

              I really don’t understand why law enforcement is so infatuated with checking my ID…

        • ddh@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yes, but Cinnabon doesn’t need to scan my face while I’m there. Every little bit helps.

        • Dave.@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          You’re never going to live in a world where you’re allowed to fly without photo id amigo

          Move to a different country.

          Eg in Australia I can book a domestic ticket and have two interactions after that:

          • x-ray/security where they scan my carry on
          • boarding at the gate where they scan my pass.

          No photo ID - or any ID really - needed. Now there’s enough dribs and drabs of information when I book the ticket and etc etc that they can identify me, but there’s nothing stopping someone from booking a ticket for someone else under their name.

          • GBU_28@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Wait are you really arguing Australia as a privacy and security IMPROVEMENT on three rest of western countries?

            • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              It sounds like it is an improvement for domestic flights. I don’t see anything that invalidates that argument…

        • JayObey711@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I don’t know but have you ever taken a domestic flight? Or even a Schengen one? Open border policy woks wonders for data security and also quality of life in general

      • Cosmicomical@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        won’t lead

        I would say we are already seeing / have already seen bad things happening because of this complacency. Buf of course worse things will happen if we don’t take measures.

      • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        The reality is that the ship for that kind of privacy has shipped a long time ago. Like a hundred years ago. The reality is that the authorities know details about every single person that passes through an airport. You can’t get in or out without a passport/identification.

        There is virtually no expectation to privacy at an airport. It’s a public place that is heavily monitored for good reason. And that fact isn’t hidden in the slightest. You are legally required to freely and honestly identify yourself to the authorities.

        If this was at your local bus stop, then you’d have a point. But not at airports.

        Also, the serious discussion about privacy should have started with the introduction of the smartphone. That’s when the conversation would have mattered and made a difference. But that ship has sailed.

        • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          For hundreds of years women couldn’t vote and minorities were categorically segregated. Things aren’t perfect for those groups now either but those ships had sailed and it was only because some people were vocal and outraged about it. If you’re not pissed off and making a little bit of a scene about what’s happening to human rights including privacy rights you’re part of the problem. If you see somebody protesting their picture in an airport security line, don’t be one of the sheep in the line saying hurry up buddy, you’re slowing us down. Tell the people around you he’s got every right to be upset about this. A bit of awareness and resistance is a good thing.

          • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            For hundreds of years women couldn’t vote and minorities were categorically segregated.

            That’s a strawman analogy. We’re not talking about privacy as a whole. The discussion here is about the supposed right to privacy at, what amounts to, a government controlled entrance point into the country. You have to identify yourself no matter which technology is being used. There’s no anonymity at an airport (from the government). Whether it’s technology or a piece of paper, you are legally required to identify yourself.

            I keep saying this over and over, but if you want to talk about digital privacy, focus your energy on smartphones and the internet. The impact for privacy violation and the impact for regaining privacy rights is the most effective there.

            Only a subset of any population has any interaction with an airport and the privacy implications there are next to nothing (because there is no right to anonymity there).

            • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              The more you let a government stick high resolution 3d cameras in your face and shrug it off because you’ve already lost privacy the stronger their database becomes, the more complacent you become, the more willing you become to let them do it at the train station, the post office, the crosswalk, etc. The more willing you become to put your palm on their palm reader and retina in their retina scanner when they deploy that technology. I’m not dismissing better avenues to focus efforts, I’m acknowledging the increase in surveillance and potential for abuse in the absence of any proven benefit to the people that are allegedly protected by these changes.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Simply stand away from the camera or keep your face covered with a mask, present your ID, and say, “I opt out of biometrics. I want the standard verification process.”

    This sounds like a great way for a SovCit to get a full ass inspection from a sausage-fingered security guard.

    The best you’re going to get is redirected to a very long queue of people who’s passports don’t have biometrics.

    • BetterDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Actually no, they look at your face and your ID, make sure the information matches, and move you along. No secondary inspection, no difference except you didn’t get scanned with facial recognition. It’s the same process as before facial recognition was implemented.

      Why even write that comment?

      • Squizzy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Because to get to the guy in the kiosk you have to queue up and that is likely to be long. That is what was stated.

        • BetterDev@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I’ve been in and out of DFW, BOS, and JFK since these facial recognition scanners went in and I can tell you with a great deal of confidence that there’s no additional wait time, or queue, or anything else if you opt out. There’s a TSA agent right next to the scanner who collects your ID whether you get scanned or not. That’s the same person who otherwise just checks it if you opt out. What are you even on about? Maybe its different at some airports, but I’ve been opting out every time I fly and it’s no big deal.

          • Squizzy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            I never said it was a big deal at all, it isnt.

            But there is an increased likelihood of a queue when opting for the non automated route. It is the reason automation is implemented.

            I too have been throuhh airports, it has never bothered me but if you dont go through the automated queue you might face a longer queue because a lot of previously manual customs real estate is given over to automation now.

            • BetterDev@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              ¯\(ツ)/¯ maybe, but as long as I have the option and it’s not tedious to do so (which is the case), I’m gonna opt out and encourage others to do so. Fair enough if your perspective is you want to accept whatever new security theater data collection is implemented in exchange for some perceived convenience. Making your case here with me in this conversation has taken more effort on your part than opting out of facial recognition at the security checkpoint in an airport would have, and I find that fact amusingly ironic.

              • Squizzy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                I also I never said I prefer the convenience over the privacy. Here is a tip, just because you hold a viewpoint does not mean it is infallible. There ae trade offs. While personally I am scurity and privacy conscious, I was pointing out the barrier for people to opt out, that is all. There is no two ways about it, unless there are a ratoo of 1:1 staff to passengers who opt out there will be a queue. The machines were put in in massive volume far exceeding the number of staff that would ever be checking people through in order to speed up the experience and due to them costing less to run.

                I agree with you. You can still be objective and recognise the situation for what it is. A barrier to opting out is the likelihood that the manual check through takes more time. It doesnt have to be significantly more time.

  • 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s about normalizing survellience, and the article also says this as an opinion further down in the text.

    Everyone can see that we are going towards the society in black mirror, with social scores, and people being punished for not complying with rules of any kind. I’m glad I’m kind of old because the future will suck.

  • Björn Tantau@swg-empire.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Stupid privacy people. What’s the worst that could happen? A fascist coming into power next year who could misuse the data?

    • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Stupid privacy people. What’s the worst that could happen? Surveillance companies that have already scoured the internet for photos of people to build a giant database of people?

      It’s also not like they could ever use the hundreds of other cameras all over the airports. What would they do with all that data anyways?

  • Imhotep@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    For international flights, US citizens can opt out but foreign nationals have to participate in face scanning, [with some exceptions]

    I had no idea we were already at that point.

    always wanted to visit the US. I guess that won’t happen then.

    I refuse to participate in this dystopia. But I’m a little worried this will make me a recluse

    • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Trust me you’re already a recluse relative to most by being on here. If you observe what passes for a “normal” “person” these days, they will endlessly scroll algorithmic ai-generated incomprehensible horrors on Tiktok, then purchase something through an ad from temu, they do not think. They are gone.

      But once you stop worrying that you may be saying no to experiences too much purely on principle, then you’re free to go even further and eradicate surveillance capitalism influence from your life altogether. One day you can ascend to even go smartphone-free.

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        If you observe what passes for a “normal” “person” these days, they will endlessly scroll algorithmic ai-generated incomprehensible horrors on Tiktok, then purchase something through an ad from temu, they do not think.

        Can you just like, not be so damn condescending and elitist? Literally saying people who use TikTok and purchase stuff from Temu are sub-human

        • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Yeah I’m sorry, I just feel pretty strongly about this I guess and Lemmy is one of the few safe places to vent to like-minded folks.

          To explain myself a little: It’s not the “normies” that the techy people hate, it’s the perverted messed up world those less savvy in technology live in and everything about it, and with how much we’ve learned to circumvent corporate control it’s often a culture shock to see that people just take it, even stuff like online ads or algorithmic content feeds, stuff I haven’t experienced in probably a decade, like as if that’s just normal, and the sad part is it is for so many.

          Imagine if most of the world population was just falling for pyramid schemes or other blatant financial scams constantly. That’s how it feels.

          It becomes all too easy to blame the people rather than the systems that led to this, and sometimes it just feels like nobody outside of the hacker (classic definition) circles really gives enough of a shit to take control of the few things they can, and this is late stage capitalism, so I can’t really blame them, we’re all so tired just trying to survive.

          • JackbyDev@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            If I thought people were just taking it I’d agree, but a lot of people genuinely don’t know what things like ad blockers are. Much less something like using ad guard dns or pi hole. They’ve just never heard of it.

      • Emerald@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        they will endlessly scroll algorithmic ai-generated incomprehensible horrors on Tiktok

        How is that much different from scrolling Lemmy? They are both social media

        • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Because Lemmy is Free, as in Libre and as in free beer, it is open source, and on top of all that, it’s not run for-profit by a single large corporate entity, it’s decentralised structure precludes that by design.

          There is nothing actually wrong with websites or forums like this or “social media”, not anymore than there is anything wrong with atoms even if humans found a way to make a weapon of it.

          In this case technology is weaponized by capitalism, and they’ll do anything to make you think it’s anything but the corporations who are to blame, misinformation on top of misinformation.

          The “mental health effects” of social media or smartphones are all just corporate distractions from the fact all those are really effects of capitalism. Even cryptocurrency isn’t actually bad inherently, I use monero all the time, it’s a great idea actually, especially where power consumption is addressed, but capitalism made it a speculative assets and state backed players wrestle for control. AI too. Open source LLMs benefit everyone, but the lack of tech literacy turned progressives against it and the played right into OpenAI and the rest of those scumbags’ hands.

          The fact that those who aren’t immersed in tech don’t know this is why all is lost. For the common man - they won, and it’s all black box products made to exploit people to the last drop.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        One day you can ascend to even go smartphone-free.

        Ascended to that in late 2014 because using a smartphone was a trigger for my anxiety.

        Back to using those since 2020 because of WhatsApp calls, apps for every shit and such being needed in life.

        • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I have two these days, one Google™️ Pixel™️ for all government and job bullshit, and one crappy old riced to hell and back Sony for everything else. No Google play, no SIM, rooted and ROM’d, no problems, just a neat multi tool in a pinch.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Get clear ones. Most (all?) of those security cameras use IR illumination to ID you, so you can have lenses that allow visible light through, but mess up IR scanning. I think you can get them w/ prescription lenses if you email the creator, so you can legitimately tell them you need your glasses to see (if you need a prescription, that is).

  • slickgoat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    The game was lost for me when I started getting fingerprinted at certain airports. This privilege used to be reserved for suspected criminals. Now we’re are all suspected criminals on a default setting.

  • NewAgeOldPerson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I went thru naturalization process. They have everything already. Including DNA, retina scan, etc. So I opted for Clear. Global Entry as well. They have it all already. May as well fast track going thru customs.

    • WolfLink@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Clear is run by a 3rd party company. TSA pre-check is run by the government. TSA pre-check comes free with Global Entry, you just need to sign up for it.

  • Wilzax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I figure that by being in the airport there’s enough footage of my face from security cameras that I didn’t consent to (other than by being in public) that the scan of my face while boarding is moot.

    Opting out of this face scan in particular is like using Chrome to browse the web, but searching with DuckDuckGo “for privacy reasons”

      • Wilzax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Sure, but what’s stopping them from just adding whatever high res cameras they want in their terminals and jet bridges anyway? How can we be sure they aren’t already doing that? The only thing the face scan does that those cameras can’t is require you to lower your mask.

        • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Sure, but what’s stopping them from just adding whatever high res cameras they want in their terminals and jet bridges anyway?

          Budget probably.

          • ulterno@lemmy.kde.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Yeah, because just adding high-res cameras is not good enough.
            They will need a good quality data transfer network with it and also have to use higher powered computers for data processing, to get whatever they want out of those videos.

            They might even have to pay *shriek* C++ devs to rewrite their Python prototype into a more efficient production code (and considering how hard it is to find devs that actually know what they are doing…).

        • Spedwell@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          As the article points out, TSA is using this tech to improve efficiency. Every request for manual verification breaks their flow, requires an agent to come address you, and eats more time. At the very least, you ought not to scan in the hopes that TSA metrics look poor enough they decide this tech isn’t practical to use.

    • TonyOstrich@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      There is a reason I wear a large hat and a mask when walking through the airport and generally keep my head tilted down. I also wear large sunglasses, but that’s as much because every airport has at least one giant wall that is nothing but glass and inevitably I will walk around a corner and get face fucked by the sun. The privacy is just a bonus 😅

  • merde alors@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    For international flights, US citizens can opt out but foreign nationals have to participate in face scanning, with some exceptions.

        • Dagnet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I remember when travelling in the US (Im a foreigner) there was a vip pass thingy to skip lines and enter without even talking to a migration officer (I think). Really seemed like a rich person pass

          • M500@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Yeah, there are two different programs. One is for domestic flights and one is for domestic and international.

            I did the domestic flight one once because it was free with my credit card.

            But I had to fill out some forms and interview in person.

            I only got to use it once because they vip lanes were always closed.

            It’s only worth it if you need to travel a lot.

            Additionally, I’ve never really suffered long lines through airport security.

            The long lines are typically at immigrations and you can’t skip those outside of being a diplomat or private jet rich.

          • noseatbelt@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            I’m Canadian and I used to have a pass like that. It was $50 at the time and valid for 5 years.

  • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m going to assume they can you the moment you walk into the airport.

    I used to be extra during the TSA body scan BS. And honestly, I felt like they won.

    • henfredemars@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I tried to refuse the face scan and they looked at me like I just grew eye stalks. After a long pause, I said never mind I need to catch this flight, let’s do it.

      It’s not a hill I’m willing to die on, even though I’m disappointed with the practice.

      • techt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I refused, it went fine. I had to repeat myself because it was unexpected and dudebro wasn’t prepared, and they had to turn on the other machine and wait for it to start up, but it only delayed me like 2 minutes. The more people ask, the easier it gets.

    • ThunderWhiskers@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s the fun part about the war for privacy. We have already lost and if you make a big deal about it they’re just going to make your life hell!

      • techt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s not such a binary thing as winning or losing, it’s a constantly shifting process. The only way to actually lose is by giving up – instead, consider it making it as hard as possible for your privacy to be infringed upon. Sometimes it’s more inconvenient, but what makes us such a farmable populace is our reluctance to be inconvenienced. Be good at being uncomfortable.

      • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        They pulled me in a private room when I refused to body scan and my bag was suspicious.

        It was an extra 25 minutes. Enough to be inconvenient as they tried to find two available TSA agents willing to body check me then check every single item in my suitcase.

  • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I find stupid to give away my biometric data to everyone asking for it just because I give it away once in exchange of my passport, but I guess that’s just me.