• CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Um, of course it’s wrong. The DHS (correctly) identified the right wing domestic terrorist threat wayyyyy back under Bush.

    Naturally, the radical right wing freaked right out over this revelation.

  • skibidi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Common misconception. He was actually saying most political violence is committed by people politically to his left, which I think is undoubtedly true.

  • notsure@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I want to change the world. (you have to kill people) I want to affect the world. (you have to kill people) I want to make the world a better place…(you have to kill people) GIVE ME MONEY TO KILL PEOPLE!

    The progression here…

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    If the Left perpetrated violence the way the Right says we do, we’d have executed most of their leaders by now.

    I’m anti-violence, fwiw. It’s one of the reasons I believe we’re gonna lose in the longterm. We have fucking morality and ethics to contend with and they just lie and cheat openly and shamelessly.

    • photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Not true. Groups that are made up of altruistic individuals who work together are more successful than groups made up of individuals out for themselves. That’s part of the reason why democracy has prevailed over monarchy and despotism.

  • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Right-wing extremists were just as likely to commit violent acts as those motivated by Islamic extremism, the researchers found. Left-wing extremists were a distant third.

    I can’t speak for every leftist, but I don’t think anything can really be accomplished through individual, random acts of violence. Then again, I don’t really think very much of anything can be accomplished through any means, really. I’ve come to see hope as futile and change as impossible. But, I do think acts of violence are especially futile. Plus, I don’t really want to hurt anyone, even people I don’t like very much.

    • OsaErisXero@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Several things can be accomplished: instilling fear, forcing disproportionate responses, provide thinly veiled excuses for… well, almost anything.

      It’s just that there’s nothing positive that can be accomplished that way.

    • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m pretty sure if you, like, locked the doors at cpac and filled the rooms with carbon monoxide so they all died, you’d accomplish quite a lot. It wouldn’t fix everything, but a lot of evil doers would be gone.

      • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I don’t know, I’m not so sure. The problems are systemic, not necessarily a result of a few people of poor moral character just doing evil things. So, even if you eliminate all the evil-doers, because they were products of the system, new evil-doers will emerge to take their place, so long as the system remains unchanged.

        • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I don’t entirely disagree. However, if enough of the active evil doers were removed, it would be easier to change the system. Like, we could fund education better if we didn’t have Republicans constantly trying to gut it.

  • dudinax@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Uh, January 6th? I’m pretty sure the sum total of political violence on that day swamps everything else for years.

  • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I can’t find anything in the article that suggests a reporter called out his lies to his face.

    We need some real journalists covering these ghouls, not stenographers.

  • Swordgeek@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    AP is doing the Heritage Foundation’s work with this article.

    The unhinged fascists don’t need to be right. They don’t need to be taken at face value. They don’t need anything but publicity, and AP is giving it to them.

  • thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Right-wing extremists were just as likely to commit violent acts as those motivated by Islamic extremism, the researchers found. Left-wing extremists were a distant third.

    Word.

    • TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      The only thing white people are actually currently embracing with supremacy: violence against their own citizens.

      • InternetUser2012@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        They’ll just flip it and go see, we were right, the left are terrorists!! There needs to be enforced legislation. News should be news. It has to be factual and unbiased. Instead, we have corporations saying whatever the hell they want so their guy gets in and hurts the people they hate while giving them tax breaks.

        • Freefall@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          News should be like the Michelin star system. One star means you are following basic reporting practices and can call yourself “reporters”. 4 star is “news” and you are held to stringent fact checking and balanced reporting practices and can call yourself News or have News in your name. 5star would be super special paragon of journalism, opinion-free reporting of facts thing. Zero stars would be “just asking questions here!” level.

          No censorship or anything, just an indicator of how reliable sources are. And make it mandatory to display like their channel bug in the corner, but a restaurant grade type thing.

          • InternetUser2012@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            The problem still is, people will ignore that. Look at how many suckers believe fox “news” now? It wouldn’t change anything.

    • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      There are, already; their preferred candidates usually get a bump in polling. Why let the truth stand in the way of that?