• Black616Angel@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Apple will have a USB-C connector (capable of fast charging tech), but will only support slow 5V charging (for most non-apple chargers?)…

    • moitoi@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      This is wrong. The iPhone must comply with Power Delivery at 100W and must use USB-C. It’s the EU reglementation. Now,the trick can be they don’t follow this outside the EU.

          • black0ut@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            10 months ago

            It’s faster than network data transfer. I don’t know exactly how fast can WiFi go, but most if the time it can’t even exceed 1Gbps. However, USB-C 4 V2 can reach 80 Gbps, and isn’t all that affected by electromagnetic interference.

            For transfering a few photos, you won’t notice a difference. But if you need to back up a 256 GB phone, the difference in speed is actually big.

            • flashgnash@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              I guess so, I don’t see much reason why I’d need to back up my whole phone in this day and age though, photos documents and notes are all backed up through syncthing/Google photos and that runs in the background constantly so not like I’m waiting

              Contacts, installed apps and I believe some settings are backed up to my Google account and will follow me without even thinking about it

              I guess game save data but personally I don’t play games on my phone anymore anyway so that’s not a big deal for me

              Could quite happily wipe my phone tomorrow and be back up and running with all my data within 30 mins max and have never needed to plug it in

              • black0ut@pawb.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                Most people do what you say, but there are places where you don’t have a stable internet connection, or people who like to keep their storage offline.

                I don’t mean to say that there are no alternatives to a fast cable, or that most people should use it. But it’s a feature that comes with the cable, and there shouldn’t be someone trying to cap it just for profit.

                The controllers for the communication protocol probably cost something like 8 cents, Apple shouldn’t screw their customers over that little cost. Even with a feature most people won’t use, because it’s nice knowing that you have the possibility to use it if you need to.

                • flashgnash@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Oh yeah I’m not trying to argue they are justified in doing this in the slightest don’t get me wrong apple sucks for decisions like this

    • Shayeta@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Honestly, I find this preferable. I only charge at night and a battery that charges slowly lasts longer.

        • happyhippo@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          11 months ago

          Most of Apple users I’ve met master the art of turning Apple’s crap decisions into features and advantages over the competition.

          I lost all faith in those folks being reasonable.

        • TWeaK@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          I really wish we had the capability to stop charging early. I’d love to leave my phone plugged in for crazy long periods, but only keep the battery at like 70%. This way it wouldn’t degrade performance from the batteries being left at full charge.

          • Toast@lemmy.film
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            Are you sure you don’t already have something like this? My android is a couple years old, but has always let me charge to only 85%

            • TWeaK@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              It’s not a feature commonly found in AOSP ROMs, in my experience.

              • Toast@lemmy.film
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                That’s unfortunate, I guess. I mean, even though I do have my phone set to only charge up to 85%, I don’t really know if this is battery protective or not.

                Is it?

                I just enabled the option because the description of the feature claimed it to be. I haven’t researched this at all

                • TWeaK@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Yes it should be, somewhat anyway. Primarily batteries wear out through use, both charging and discharging - if your phone is plugged in but not charging, then your phone is running off mains and the battery isn’t being used. However, batteries also wear out over time, albeit much more slowly. Manufacturer’s typically recommend keeping batteries in long term storage at around 70% to minimise this effect. If you’re always plugged into mains at 100% charge, then you’re not following this storage recommendation. Leaving it at 100% won’t kill the battery, but its capacity will go down quicker than if left at a lower charge.