Sorry this is kinda political. Is there an asklemmypolitics group this would be better for? I’m hoping not to get into the libs vs progressives political debate we see everywhere on here… Just want to know what people are actually looking for.

    • TurboWafflz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Right, you instead let the other candidate who is just as likely to fund genocide win and pretend to be superior somehow for “not encouraging it”. I’m sure everyone who suffers as a result of project 2025 will appreciate your stance.

      • Bad_Engineering@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Trump is not just “likely” to fund more genocide, he will fully endorse it. Hell, one of his favorite lapdogs just suggested that Israel should nuke Gaza.

      • Gabadabs@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Respectfully, I understand the idea of voting for a liberal candidate as harm reduction, and have done so in the past. But every time I have done so, such as with the last election, the government causing harm has continued, to an insane extent. Voting is one political action you can take, but it is not everything you should be doing, and I believe in having standards for candidates I’m willing to give my vote. Biden is not one of them.

    • livus@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Then if he stops funding genocide and takes real measures to try to halt the Gaza genocide, he would then earn your vote?