“The guy is not a democrat with a small d,” the president told CNN’s Erin Burnett.

President Joe Biden said in an interview Wednesday he is all but certain Donald Trump, his predecessor and presumptive 2024 rival, will reject the results of the November election and called Trump “dangerous” for the nation.

“The guy is not a democrat with a small d,” Biden told CNN’s Erin Burnett during a visit to Wisconsin this week.

“How many court cases do they have, Supreme Court cases? They’ve all said this is a totally legitimate election. … He may not accept the outcome of the election? I promise you he won’t. Which is dangerous.”

The president went on to say other world leaders had expressed to him their fear of a second Trump presidency and pointed to Trump’s pledge to prosecute his political opponents if he enters the Oval Office once more.

  • CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Don’t you think you could give a shred of evidence for why you feel you can both-sides this? Though I have a feeling your supporting argument for this will be a painfully bad take.

    • ZeroCool@vger.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Though I have a feeling your supporting argument for this will be a painfully bad take.

      Okay, so the rules are simple, we all take a shot of rum every time they say “russiagate” or “nothingburger”. Sound good? Great, I’ll grab some glasses.

    • pb42184@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Its a prediction not an argument

      Under no circumstances will we see the truth of both predictions

      Hopefully Biden will win and we’ll see whether the GOP accepts it. That would be the evidence for half.

      If God forbid Trump wins, we’ll have evidence whether the WMP accepts it. That would be evidence for the other half.

      I would LOVE to be wrong, but sometimes that how the human scientific process works. We make a prediction THEN look at the evidence to see if we were right

      • CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s just my prediction bro! But there is a 100.00% chance. That’s right, it’s definitely going to happen, but I can’t say why. But we’ll just have to see what happens! It’s called science, ever heard of it?

        • pb42184@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Heh, fair. I do think 9999/10,000 is about right but I don’t know you enough to trust you enough to make odds.

          Tell you what. One sided free money bet. If you claim WMP will just say “Well, guess we lost this one” and not say the race was rigged (is this your claim? You still haven’t claimed it yet I think) I’ll come back in November with a post titled “CoggyMcFee I’m Calling You Out!” linking this post.

          If Biden wins, so much the better for the world. If GOP doesn’t accept it we’re both winners, no trade. If GOP accepts it we’re both losers, no trade.

          If Trump wins, God help us, and WMP just says “Congratulations, hope we win next time” I’ll give $500 to your favorite charity, or half that to anyone I can’t write off, yourself included.

          If Trump wins and WMP says the election was rigged, well, you haven’t agreed to anything and owe me nothing. If you feel honor bound, my charity is OSI the Open Space Institute.

          https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prediction_market

          If I forget call my ass out. If Trump wins frankly we have bigger problems but I’ll pay.

      • ZeroCool@vger.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I would LOVE to be wrong, but sometimes that how the human scientific process works. We make a prediction THEN look at the evidence to see if we were right

        A baseless prediction is of no value whatsoever. A theory with no evidence to support it is not worth anyone’s time or consideration. But please, continue lecturing us about the scientific method.

        • pb42184@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Not sure “lecturing” is accurate but sure, I’ll allow it.

          For the record, is it your claim that if Trump wins, we will just accept it as the results of a free and fair election? Just “Welp, guess the voters were in your favor this time Donnie. Good game. We’ll try to bring it in four years!” right?

          Also for the record we agree that Trump could get no states and 30% of the popular vote and still say it was fixed and he should have won right? Honestly that’s the result I predict most likely so the experiment will likely be of no value. Just saying.