• hark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      From the article:

      All that would be left behind was a tiny red dot where the dart entered the body, undetectable to those who didn’t know to look for it.

      • bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Well that’s it. Case closed. The existence of a heart attack gun in 1968 proves Boeing killed 2 whistleblowers in 2024. Good job gang.

        • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Well that’s it. Case closed. The existence of a heart attack gun in 1968 proves Boeing killed 2 whistleblowers in 2024. Good job gang.

          Literally no one has made that statement, including me, the guy who brought up the heart attack gun. Take a breath man.

          • bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Yeah I’m so worked up over here…?

            He is clearly implying that the boeing thing is possible because things like this exist. Otherwise why bring it up?

    • maynarkh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      They may have ironed that out, this article is talking about tech that is more than half a century old. We got from first aeroplane to man on the moon in less than that.