neidu2@feddit.nl to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world · edit-23 months agoWith two Boeing whistleblowers dead in one month, either Boeing is actively killing them, or there are enough whistleblowers that this rate of death is not statistically significantmessage-square79fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up11arrow-down1message-squareWith two Boeing whistleblowers dead in one month, either Boeing is actively killing them, or there are enough whistleblowers that this rate of death is not statistically significantneidu2@feddit.nl to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world · edit-23 months agomessage-square79fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareBernie Ecclestoned@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-23 months agoThe guy already gave his statement at a deposition. Why on earth would they kill him after the fact?
minus-squareNOT_RICK@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 months agoPerhaps as a warning to other potential whistleblowers?
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 months agoMaybe the compound infection took longer to take effect than they had planned.
minus-squareintensely_human@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 months agoIt’s a message about the consequences of such a move
minus-squareAmidFuror@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 months agoTo give conspiracy theorists something to do.
The guy already gave his statement at a deposition. Why on earth would they kill him after the fact?
Perhaps as a warning to other potential whistleblowers?
Maybe the compound infection took longer to take effect than they had planned.
To stop others having the same idea.
It’s a message about the consequences of such a move
To give conspiracy theorists something to do.