It was no April Fool’s joke.

Harry Potter author-turned culture warrior J.K. Rowling kicked off the month with an 11-tweet social media thread in which she argued 10 transgender women were men — and dared Scottish police to arrest her.

Rowling’s intervention came as a controversial new Scottish government law, aimed at protecting minority groups from hate crimes, took effect. And it landed amid a fierce debate over both the legal status of transgender people in Scotland and over what actually constitutes a hate crime.

Already the law has generated far more international buzz than is normal for legislation passed by a small nation’s devolved parliament.

    • Cyberspark@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      To be honest it’s not. It’s extreme and the content of the bill itself breaks the very law it describes.

      Basically if you say any comment about a singled out group and anyone over heard you and takes offence you can br prosecuted.

      So you’re in your own home, on the phone, talking about how all black guys have massive dicks. A neighbour overhears, gets offended and reports you. Even if you don’t get arrested, prosecuted or go to jail that incident goes on your permanent record.

    • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Israely bombs sometimes hit Hamas, not just civilians. Does not make them good. Just like (supposedly) doing a good thing in this one case does not make it a good law.

      And it was confirmed Rowling won’t even be prosecuted. Because of course these kind of laws don’t apply to the rich and famous hatemongers. They apply to the poor schmuck making a bad taste joke.

      • ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        They apply to the poor schmuck making a bad taste joke.

        Being trans because you can’t live with the body you were born in is not optional. It’s often the choice between being able to live, or ditching life in that body, though I don’t expect you to know that.

        But unlike being trans, making shitty derogatory jokes about people unlike yourself IS optional, and an overt exercise in personal privilege.

        Right now, trans people are under extreme threat to both peace and life, and it’s just getting worse. I already know you don’t give a shit because your sympathy is clearly with people mocking them, but in truth you’re punching down on people you know nothing about, happy to make mirth out of what is incredibly painful to others, in a way that is clearly beyond your ability to comprehend.

        Instead of requiring that the rest of us excuse your need to mock others you think can’t hit back, maybe examine your own life choices – with the specific goal of understanding what the fuck is so malfunctioning in YOU that you need to punch down on entire groups of humans.

        I suggest this because the only difference between a trans person and a cis/het like myself is that often their difference is physically visible, while yours only comes into view when making shitty anti-trans cracks or writing about how it’s only a joke, only “bad taste,” and how very disadvantaged you are because others see it for the twisted hatefulness it really is.

    • EnderMB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Except for the fact that Scottish police already came out to say that she wouldn’t be charged for recent comments.

        • Fedizen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          that’s never stopped them. Jordan Peterson got famous by misinterpreting a canadian law to mean people would get jailed for misgendering trans people.