• Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    It’s not the best of both though, it just the worst of both.

    The best of both are small towns along railways, with a dense core with some amenities surrounded by decreasing density until it quickly becomes pure countryside, and thanks to the station it’s easy to get to and from the big city.

    And if you only want rural surroundings you can have train halts basically in the middle of nowhere, there’s a couple like that in my region and it’s absolutely delightful.

    • PiJiNWiNg@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      So do you put a population limit on small towns? How do you think major Metropolitan areas got started? They didn’t just appear one day, they grew over time from small port and station towns…

      • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        huh? why would suburbs magically be exempt from that idea?

        Yes, places grow, this is why it’s important to apply good urban planning and use as much high density housing as possible, otherwise you get the miserable car-dependent sprawl we see in america and much of the rest of the world.

        By centering around transit stops you get rid of the need for all the parking and roads that takes a ton of space (which lets urban areas be smaller while containing the same amount of living space), and by having many small towns with high density centers spread out like this you maximize how many people can live close to the countryside.