• Smorty [she/her]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I have a Watt-Meter right on my PC plug next to my monitor so I can always see how much I consume. It’s crazy how much the monitors alone take up, it’s kind 40 KW/h each. I’m considering removing one of them.

      • azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Neither hopefully. The former at least is a unit of power, but 40 kW is enough to heat up a whole apartment building.

        In reality a large and older monitor might use a couple hundred watts. A small modern 24" will probably use closer to 50 W (guesstimating), which is still a decent chunk of the power draw of a budget build.

    • sploosh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      KW/h is a measure of total energy, not instantaneous power. Your watt meter was saying that since last reset of the value it measured 40 KW/h of energy use. That’s not an insignificant amount - a Chevy Bolt can go around 180 miles on 40KW/h. Watts, or kilowatts, are instantaneous power. That same Bolt can easily pull 100KW while accelerating and if it could somehow do that for an hour, it would have used 100KW/h. It could never make it the whole hour as it has a 65KW/h battery, so it would run out after 39 minutes.

      • bob_lemon@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        What you’re describing is kWh, not kW/h. You need to multiply power with time to get back to energy. An appliance using 1kW of power for 1h “uses” 1kWh of energy. The same appliance running for 2h requires 2kWh instead.

        kW/h doesn’t really make sense as a unit, although it could technically describe the rate at which energy consumption changes over time.