• dRail@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    That and it rubbed me wrong when he went into small businesses to buy them out, only to ridicule all their product for being useless garbage.

      • Deceptichum@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mXBzBFxe00o

        He goes into one of those dingy old PC stores that have walls crammed with dusty products that haven’t been sold in like 15 years and buy everything, even turns it into a bit of game with the owner where they roll a giant foam or play darts dice to see if he’s going to pay ridiculous prices for some of the products. Like many of these boxes are literally early 00’s tech that never moved and was just sitting there.

        To be offended over that video is utterly ridiculous and it’s clearly all in good fun with the owner, who gets to avoid making a loss of stock he should’ve thrown out decades ago.

        • dRail@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          It may be my mode of thinking. To me it feels like a power move. The 1% tend to do things like this to flaunt their money, or to manipulate the world into showing people what this kind of power can do for them. It builds people up to aspirations that absolute wealth is a positive thing. Yet, people that are given this kind of money all the sudden, tend to spend it all and bankrupt themselves. There is also the fact that although tech is older, there is still a market for it, as capitalism tells us all we need the hip new thing, people just see it as garbage.

          • cheesepotatoes@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            To imply he’s part of the 1% is absurd. He’s a small Canadian business owner. He’s well off sure, but he’s not fucking muskrat with hundreds of billions in net worth.

            • TunaLobster@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              If he’s not there, he’s pretty close. That level is about 500k a year or maybe a bit more for Vancouver. He talked about living a year at a lower salary to show his kids how the majority of people live. So wagering a guess that he takes home enough that it makes life experiences different.

            • dRail@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              I was saying the actions. I am implying that the 1% buy people out like it is nothing, as was demonstrated in this video.

      • Footnote2669@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        He’s talking about a video where Linus went to a local tech shop. The products in said shop were… very old gen, Linus made some fun about it. He bought everything that was in the front of the store. That way the store owner had money to buy stuff that’s current gen and useful. A bit of a nostalgia trip

    • TunaLobster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      The owner was obviously happy to be rid of the old stock. They knew it wasn’t moving. It is tech waste for a majority of the western world. Yes that stuff is still useful in other places arithe world, but it’s just not particular to have it in a shop in urban Canada. The owner was obviously a good sport to play the games the video and expressed gratitude to be able to sell a bunch of stuff.

      You’ve missed some social cues or are looking for any small thing to pounce on. Go touch grass.

      • dRail@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’m not disagreeing with you. I saw that the owner was happy. I may have missed these queues, as I am not great at being social. I am looking at the deeper meaning. I am looking not at the actions, but what it represents, which is the fact that this teaches kids that they can buy people, and be happy in a world of commercialism is all. To me this is wrong.