Surprise!!

  • HopeOfTheGunblade@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Okay but that already happened. There’s another case determining the part about whether he goes to jail for it, but that he is an insurrectionist per the amendment is already resolved.

    • blazera@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s not resolved, this is the same case, a higher court can overrule their decision. It was never their jurisdiction to decide if he committed federal crimes.

      • HopeOfTheGunblade@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Right. It was their jurisdiction to decide if he was an insurrectionist per the amendment. They did, he is. Federal crimes is a different case. Just like the recent defamation case ruled he was a sexual assaulter. Wasn’t a criminal case, didn’t carry the risk of jail time, did have consequences.

        • blazera@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          In that case, the sexual assault had no consequences, it was a defamation case. Like it didnt involve him having to register as a sex offender or anything, because in the eyes of the law he isn’t one.