The “Manifest V3” rollout is back after letting tensions cool for a year.

    • soggy_kitty@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Preaching to the wrong crowd there buddy, you want to be convincing the exact type of person who isn’t on Lemmy

      • kratoz29@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’m pretty sure ad experience will move some masses, I liked Chrome because Ublock works fine there, it has great extensions support and the best compatibility with the websites, but if you remove the adblocker support I would have moved (if I hadn’t already) in a heartbeat

    • Norah - She/They@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      Firefox is my daily, but the fact I have to fire up a chromium browser to use web serial or midi is an endless annoyance. Mozilla won’t add that functionality as they see it as a security risk.

    • marco@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      For a while I was a bit confused, because Mozilla said they would also implement V3 Manifest …

      by implementing Manifest V3 on its own terms, Mozilla saves developers who are switching to the new platform from having to support two different versions of their extensions (for Google Chrome and Firefox) at the same time. On the other hand, it allows content-blocking extensions that were originally built using the less restrictive Manifest V2 to continue working at full tilt.

      https://adguard.com/en/blog/firefox-manifestv3-chrome-adblocking.html