Lemmy hasn’t been and practically can’t be co-opted by fascist theocrats. Reddit definitely has been.

It just ran out of air.

Yes, did you?

You talk of being reasonable but posit the most unreasonable position and claim it’s as proof that others are unreasonable.

You’re completely full of shit.

Meanwhile, please show me a truly centrist path to the battle for rights. I would love to hear what a person like you sees as a reasonable outcome that somehow pleases those who deserve something unalienable and those who wish to obliterate those who fight for something unalienable.

Let’s give gay people half of their rights

That you think of this as the example of compromise really explains where you mind is.

Your point is moronic. You guys think you’re being reasonable and finding the middle when all that’s happening is you’re being pipelined into fascism with some extra steps.

Oh look an Enlightened Centrist post. I thought you morons all stayed with Reddit.

Not if you’re breaking the data into quartiles. Holy shit, do you really think the curve will be any different? Really? All that will happen is that some people will move around in the distribution. And the smoothing does not at all relate to how intelligence is measured but rather how it’s reported - in this graph.

God dies not take kindly to charlatans and blowhards

I thought God was perfect and loved all.his children equally.

Why are these memes so shit?

You’re being downvoted but you’re absolutely correct.

You’re wrong. Just plain wrong. I think you might to think about stopping yourself.

Yeah fuck off shitcunt.

In the same way that IRC was in the 90s.

Uh great for you, I guess?

What does your UI gripe have to do with this biased tabloid piece you shared?

Firefox is fine and works even better than it ever has. If you cared about the UI so much you’d have tried any of its forks that use different and older designs.

Sync isn’t FOSS. It’s just free.

Your brain understands concepts and can self-conceptualise, LLMs cannot do either. They can sound convincingly as if they understand concepts but that’s because we fill in gaps due to how we understand language. The examples of broken or distorted sentences being understandable applies here. You and I can communicate in broken sentences because you and I understand the concepts beneath the conversation. LLMs play on that understanding but they do not understand its concepts.