When a movement builds itself of reduction in governance, the antisocial people we successfully govern against get a hard on

Libertarianism at its core is just a rejection of your responsibility for the things you benefit from in society that you didn’t personally play a role in crafting. There’s a reason white supremacists find it fertile ground for justifying their position.

Woo federation

As stated in the article, this has less to do with using AI, more to do with sloppy code reviews and code quality enforcement. Bad code from AI is just the latest version of mindlessly pasting from Stack Overflow.

I encourage jrs to use tools such as Phind for solving problems but I also expect them to understand what they’re submitting and be ready to defend it no differently to any other PR. If they’re submitting code they don’t understand that’s incredibly unprofessional and I would come down very hard on them. They don’t do this though because we don’t hire dickheads.

No, it isn’t. Poor code quality peer review checks and QA policies are more to blame. We shouldn’t care how an individual developer generates a solution, it should be irrelevant whether they wrote it in reference to docs, copy pasted from stack overflow or generated by AI. I encourage Jrs to use AI as I think it can be a great problem solving tool, but you better understand what you’re submitting to PR otherwise you’re an absolute schmuck.

I refuse to talk any subject which has multiple potential perspectives on with my dad. Even if I agree with him he makes me feel shit. That boomer self righteousness is repulsive.

is that a term you absorbed from zero punctuation?

so long dental plan!

if you can say “Humans are awesome”, which you can whilst everyone knows the caveats to that, you can say Jews are awesome.

Plenty of religious people are non-violent and plenty of non-religious people are. It is indeed one of the easiest routes to radicalise someone to do awful things but also not the only one.

livestock