![](/static/be9a2c79/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
Woa bro I was saying hard on but this is a full on raging erection maybe you should deal with your frustrations
Woa bro I was saying hard on but this is a full on raging erection maybe you should deal with your frustrations
Absolutely, and it’s by design by candid admission of environmentalist organizations and green parties. Their objective was over regulating the industry beyond any rationality and they succeeded.
Lemy has such a hard on against nuclear. I’m seeing reports by antinuclear think tank grifters shoved in my face almost daily…
Username checks out
Yes, this is literally what happens. If you’re too stupid to see that it’s not my problem lol
Keep telling that to yourself until they kill the nex…oh nvm it already happened 🤡
Lol nice scouring job 😂 now go ahead and tell me with a straight face it’s the same frequency and severity with pitbulls
I’m sure plenty of golden retrievers don’t have responsible owners, yet I don’t really hear of children mauled by them on the regular.
Yeah totally the customer’s fault for wanting a nice display in friggin 2024, certainly not the software’s which still has no proper support for it.
No I’m a leftist who thinks misrepresenting and degrading political discourse to the level of 5 year old children is idiotic.
This forum is exactly like its reddit counterpart: hot garbage
I don’t think you understand the concept of exponential, or radioactivity for that matter tbh. The statement is completely truthful.
The harm of ionizing radiation is given by the activity of the source. Which decays exponentially. You should not go on the internet lecturing people you don’t know about things you don’t understand.
Also, you moved the goalpost: first you claimed waste “doesn’t decay exponentially” and then without acknowledging it, you now claim that “exponential decay is not the same as losing harm exponentially”
Sorry what? That link literally explains the exponential decay of radioisotopes.
The sustainable approach at this point would be eco-dictatorship, not sure if it’s so easily achievable
Rate of decay for a specific isotope is constant, so its abundance decays exponentially. Of course a species can transmute in a new radionuclide so the process in total will not be exactly exponential, but pretty close. Seen on a log scale it’s awfully close to a straight line
Custom roms for them absolutely slap. Posting this from a still perfectly functional mi9 with Android 14.
Funny how everyone is immediately concerned with a few thousands of cubic meters of solid waste that literally loses its harm exponentially quickly and we can store underground while all the billions of tons of toxic liquid and gaseous waste coming from a sleuth of industrial applications (including renewables production) constantly being pumped in the biosphere never get a mention
Well you know how that goes.
I don’t, please elaborate.
Don’t you already need to unlock the phone to change USB protocol?