think disallowing votes (down or both) from non-subscribers would defeat the point of the all feed, which to me is to display the most active/interesting posts on the Fediverse right now. You can’t have that if it is only community subscribers that vote.
isn’t this what ‘scaled’ sorting is / could be for?
How would this work? Do websites with rss feeds normally publish the url to that feed in some standard place?
feeds are usually advertised in the page header as below, with type
set to either application/rss+xml
or application/atom+xml
.
<head>
<link rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" title="Example Feed" href="https://example.com/feed/" />
</head>
Are there any third party extensions that do it?
i don’t know about chrom[e|ium], but i use Awesome RSS for firefox.
You need to enable JavaScript to run this app.
except when the commodity is a basic necessity and there’s no alternatives. ‘the market’ can’t really ‘vote with their wallet’ on the cost and quality of shelter, particularly when price fixing is rampant.
sidenote: ‘voting with your wallet’ implies people with more money than you should have more say in what’s ‘more valuable’, because the rich can always outbid you, and homo economicus is only a thought experiment. (see: foreign real estate investment, conspicuous consumption…)