Na it’s bread in a meat bun. That’s why the caption calls it a “dog hot”, the reverse of a “hotdog”
Na it’s bread in a meat bun. That’s why the caption calls it a “dog hot”, the reverse of a “hotdog”
What’s wrong with media bias fact check? Is it itself biased?
It’s not bad. The biggest downside is just that it isn’t that big so I’ve only found a couple channels on there that I’m interested in so far. I decided to give it a shot because I really hate ads, so even just having a couple channels I liked (like neo and Mustard) ad-free was worth giving it a shot. I used a creator link to sign up at a discount which also made the price a more palatable $30 for a year: https://nebula.tv/neo
I assume you can replace the last part of that URL with a different channel’s slug to support that channel
It is a hotdog inside of a cornbread shell, often served on a wooden stick. It is commonly a kids food though lately I’ve seen some restaurants make fancier versions https://goldbelly.imgix.net/uploads/showcase_media_asset/image/164647/Original.png?ixlib=react-9.0.2&auto=format&ar=1%3A1&w=1246
I’d love some nebula channel recommendations as well
if an IQ of 100 is average, and you had an IQ of 100, you could say that you’re smarter than 50% of people, right? Let’s call those people (the ones you’re smarter than) group A. It also means that you’re in a group “top 50% of smart people”, which is just all the people smarter than those in group A. We’ll call it group B. Now, let’s say your IQ is 79. That means that now you’re only smarter than 8.1% (based on the picture) of people. Group A is much smaller because there are far fewer people stupid enough to be stupider than you. On the other hand, you’re in group B, which consists of the 91.9% of people who are smarter than group A; I.e. almost everyone.
Of course, it’s important to remember that IQ tests are not considered by everyone to be fair assessments of real intelligence, but hopefully the example above helps explain what the statistics in the post actually mean.
Here is the actual source quoted in the article: https://leehamnews.com/2024/01/15/unplanned-removal-installation-inspection-procedure-at-boeing/#comment-509962
Pretty sure they drive trains
This is the only source listed in the video description: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/donald-trump-jeffrey-epstein-documents-b2475210.html
This article was published two days ago, so seems like not actually anything new here
I’m a Picasso :/
I don’t get it :(
Guess it’s time to rewatch FMA
If we’re still using JavaScript in the year 275,760 we deserve the resulting epoch collapse
JavaScript wat
Source (with alt-text on site): https://xkcd.com/705/
“ln(x)” is another way of writing log sub e of x https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_logarithm
The “ln” of the “you son of a bitch. I’m ln” is referencing that identity
I agree, but I still have this idea that it’s rude to text people unless you have gotten permission first. I think it’s a relic from the 2000s-2010s when not everyone’s phone had texting and if you did text them they could get charged by their phone provider. Obviously nowadays that’s much less of a concern, but still feels like a social grey area for some reason
Schism?