![](/static/be9a2c79/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/h1ChnLuBHr.png)
Nope, no way to do this. It’s not implemented yet. What you could use instead is the app called Shelter to create and manage a work profile. It’s less separated than another Graphene profile, but is much more convenient
Nope, no way to do this. It’s not implemented yet. What you could use instead is the app called Shelter to create and manage a work profile. It’s less separated than another Graphene profile, but is much more convenient
Although I agree with you, I don’t think that’s what OP was asking about based on this part:
I’m just thinking that if a hacker got access to one email they’d have all account information?
It seems they are asking if an separate email account for each service would be beneficial. My opinion is it would limit the attack if an email account was hacked, but definitely not worth the hassle. Email aliasing (like the comment above me says) gives you some of the benefits without needing to juggle multiple accounts.
I believe what they mean is “fuck car centric societal design”. No reasonable person should be mad that someone is using the current system to live their life (i.e. driving to work). What the real goal is spreading awareness that a car centric society is inherently isolating and stressful, and that one more lane does absolutely nothing to lessen traffic (except for like a month ish)
Canada. Now you know two! Granted, we are basically the 51st state at this point…
Not commenting on the argument, but just FYI: “Slippery Slope” actually refers to an argument that could include a slippery slope fallacy, but not necessarily. A slippery slope fallacy is an informal fallacy, meaning that any errors are in the content and not the format of the argument (i.e. the slippery slope argument itself).
It’s 20.7 Ford F150s long
Or just make it clear your account is gone if you lose your passkey, so have a second key for backup or learn a hard lesson.
From another tall guy, how was it? Obviously not worth the price, but is it absolutely not worth the price or just very not worth the price?
I feel we are in need of a societal shift here, just like another commenter said about the printing press. When that first came out, the pushback was from the worry that the words would be attributed to someone who never said them (reverse plaigerism). The societal adjustment to this was the universal doubt that anyone said that thing without proof.
For generative AI, when it becomes widespread, photos will be generateable for literally everyone, not just minors but every person with photos online. It will be a societal shift; images will be assumed to be AI generated, making any guilt or shame about a nude photo existing obselete.
Just a matter of time so may as well start now!
This is only true for processed foods. If you stick to a whole food diet, it’s actually more common to under eat sodium, which has it’s own host of negative health effects.
When that becomes widespread, photos will be generateable for literally everyone, not just minors but every person with photos online. It will be a societal shift; images will be assumed to be AI generated, making any guilt or shame about a nude photo existing obselete.
Crazy idea: pay them both more so the public doesn’t have to
Nope, you can backup the chats and import them when installing Signal on the new device
The 3 "M"s are not numerical, but indicate characters. For example 01 Jan 2023.
Just an open source frontend for Shazam, but Audire is pretty nice for this