That is how the line of thinking goes. However, most arguments are wrong, so statistically speaking, that argument about simulation theory is probably wrong
It may surprise you to learn that ‘people’ and 'not people’s are treated differently under the law
That doesn’t make it “not copyright Infringement”, that just makes it an efficient compression algorithm. With the right prompt, you can recover copies of the original.
I am reminded of the saying: climbing a mountain is not 1% of the way to outer space
I work for a large agency of the US government. We get the “choice” between chrome and edge.
Dude, touch some grass. You’re being way too aggro at someone explaining why a person might use a particular browser
The difference between medicine and poison is the dose. The worms were not dangerous at the dose being studied, as indicated by the fact people got healthier over a 2 year period.
Fortunately, nobody is judging you for that sentiment quite as hard as you were judging people for studying nutritional health after not really reading the article.
I’m up voting just because I’m now wondering what xkcd fanservice would look like
The model is intended for commercial use, uses the entire work and creates derivative works based on it which are in direct competition.
Doing the CCPs work for them, I see
Climate change really has to be solved in this generation. You’re thinking too long term, we don’t have that kind of time.
Additionally, not all children of climate sociopaths become sociopaths. The planet increasingly makes a convincing argument even for those who weren’t taught to hear. That’s why the old propagandists have to ramp up their effort
Average wages in Nairobi is about $4/hr. These jobs weren’t generally high quality but they weren’t starvation, either.
Hey! I resemble that remark!
You’re never too old for a rave
And no SO means worse LLMs. Chatgpt relies on scrapes of SO, reddit, forums and GitHub discussion pages.