I have a reverse proxy, but that won’t do ALL traffic, right? Just http or https?
Like if I want to ssh into the different servers, it won’t handle that, will it?
I have a reverse proxy, but that won’t do ALL traffic, right? Just http or https?
Like if I want to ssh into the different servers, it won’t handle that, will it?
Who are you referring to?
Are you talking about the second dev? I was pretty aware of the community at the time and didn’t hear anything like this about the original dev.
UPDATE: It crashed again today, and I was able to pull some logs and check the temperature at the time of the crash. (91 degrees which dropped to 71 degrees right before crashing?
From system log
<13>1 2024-03-13T18:30:44-04:00 OPNsense.my.home opnsense 44846 - [meta sequenceId="1192"] /usr/local/etc/rc.newwanipv6: No IP change detected (current: IPV6ADDRESSREDACTED, interface: wan)
<13>1 2024-03-13T18:30:53-04:00 OPNsense.my.home opnsense 60522 - [meta sequenceId="1193"] /usr/local/etc/rc.newwanipv6: No IP change detected (current: IPV6ADDRESSREDACTED, interface: wan)
<45>1 2024-03-13T22:12:44-04:00 OPNsense.my.home syslog-ng 10182 - [meta sequenceId="1"] syslog-ng starting up; version='4.6.0'
<13>1 2024-03-13T22:12:45-04:00 OPNsense.my.home kernel - - [meta sequenceId="2"] ---<<BOOT>>---
<13>1 2024-03-13T22:12:45-04:00 OPNsense.my.home kernel - - [meta sequenceId="138"] WARNING: / was not properly dismounted
From dmesg
arp: 192.168.1.61 moved from someMAC to anotherMAC on igc1
arp: 192.168.1.61 moved from anotherMAC to someMAC on igc1
WARNING: / was not properly dismounted
WARNING: /: mount pending error: blocks 40 files 4
I mean, I’m not saying that errors on the drive are the CAUSE of the problem, more likely a symptom, but it does look like it just straight up crashed, right?
Especially when the software they’re developing is an emulator or for phones. This was both!
As somebody already said, it will continue to work for a few months and if the developers want to keep supporting it they can turn it into an HACS add-on
Is it the same integration that’s here?
Yeah I asked my family for a wok a few years ago and got this beautiful one that was cast iron and way too heavy. I ended up getting a carbon steel one which was about a third the weight
Wow! My sister got me a pack at Christmas 2 years ago since she remembered me loving them as a kid, and they were just as I remembered. I wonder what changed in 2 years, or if you just got a bad batch.
That sounds awful!
I think they’re referring to this https://lemmy.world/post/9384633
Though from my reading of it it seems like they got a pretty clear explanation on the top post about what was going on, it doesn’t sound like OP’s situation.
I’m very anti-apple, but PeroBasta’s post doesn’t seem like apple is doing anything weird.
That is what I have been planning per my other comments.
Modem to WAN port of firewall, LAN port of firewall to wireless router in AP mode, other lan ports to other devices?
Could you please explain in more detail? The goal is to plug my firewall directly in, as I understand it.
Worst case I’ll just use the 4 LAN ports and leave the WAN unused
That would be great, and if the WAN port becomes a LAN port, even better. I don’t see anything about that in the manual, but I’ll cross my fingers
Sopuli seems to be down, so responding from a different account.
Yeah, it’s actually that there isn’t power for the Celeron box where all the other Ethernet currently is.
Just so I’m understanding, why would all traffic need to go to my router (do you mean the opnsense one or the tplink one) twice? Wouldn’t it go Device -> Switch -> opnsense -> modem > internet? Or for my intranet communications, Device1 -> switch -> opnsense -> switch -> device2
Source? I remember a follow up to a post about that saying it was a misinterpretation of their T&Cs