Oh yeah, definitely. But never admit that when talking to gun nuts.
Oh yeah, definitely. But never admit that when talking to gun nuts.
we need publicly funded mental health care as much as we need gun control.
While the US definitely needs publicly funded (mental) health care, it will not address the gun issue. It doesn’t matter if a country has public health care or not, what matters for gun related deaths is either a) number of (civil) guns or b) (civil) war.
Do not give into gun nuts in this regard. Do not agree that the US needs both. The US needs exactly and only one thing when it comes to gun deaths: Fewer guns.
Mistakes are possible
Yeah, mistakes like american gun laws. In related news, this year, a soldier from Germany’s National Guard did not go on a killing spree. Nor did a soldier of the French National Guard.
Hell and that’s a Fox “News” poll
That’s why I instantly saved it to my phone. This picture has such a high value in “discussions” with gun freaks.
I’m working for a NATO countries’ military, am a frequent poster and avid follower of NonCredibleDefense, own weapons myself, know a lot about their inner workings and history, but even I am not even remotely as crazy as those people.
Then again, I do own several weapons but advocate that my government pass laws to take them away. Guess I’m kind of a paradoxical outlier in this matter.
Maybe it’s a typo and they meant “crab people”?
Yeah I remember that. Yeah…same with the insurrection: they can only care for about an hour, then it back to business.
That’s kinda the comment that always gets me banned: as long as Republican politicians do not actually die themselves frequently, they will not change.
Not sure what this instances views on “advocating violence” are, so I’m trying to explain it as non-violently as I still can:
Americans want gun control. That’s not up for discussion. It’s an absurd majority.
However, as long as it is “only” school children and ordinary civilians dying, Republicans will not change their stance on gun control in the slightest. The people who are responsible to fix this are the only group that is not at any risk of getting shot. They are so absurdly protected that they will never be on the receiving end of a barrel, and therefore, do not care.
And to make matters worse, the Republicans dictating the supreme court, who will block anything that could possible address this problem, not only cannot be voted out, no, they literally have to die before they can be replaced.
The only people who could fix the gun murder issue are the ones not dying because of guns.
I think it’s pretty easy to find support for gun control.
Or “oppose the second amendment”, as you propagandistically say, because you dont have facts on your side.
ReVanced doesn’t really require frequent updates. After modifying the YouTube app, I disable auto updates and keep using it until something doesn’t work properly (usually ads reappear)- Happens maybe every 4-5 months for me.
For example, the YouTube version I’m using right now is 18.23.35 from June 10th, while the newest version that can be patched with ReVanced is 18.35.44. But since I haven’t seen any issues, I didn’t even bother to check for updates. Only your comment made me check and realize that I can update it.
ReVanced can patch your YouTube client (even without root) and add (your choice of) features, for example adblocking, picture in picture, playing in background as well ad quality of life improvents like hiding the “block” of news videos, remove reels or certain buttons
Fucking Obama man. Just changing people’s nationalities!
Welcome to Fishy Joe’s!
In Germany, it was the unions who made the 5 day work week. So we can still tell God to fuck off and thank our unions like OP intended
The people who politicize everything cry about too much politics. They even politicized fucking pronouns.
They are addicted to politics, they just can’t handle seeing different opinions.
Lemmy would be a multivitamin pill or something else that’s good for you
Wtf for some reason, my comment does not appear as it supposed to and my edits do not seem to work properly. I’m referencing two tweets: https://twitter.com/condensed_the/status/1686901855358427136 and https://twitter.com/condensed_the/status/1686895266329174016
Edit: For some reason, the “<” character kills the comment
Here’s what the experts think:
Condensed Matter Theory Center of the University of Maryland about the original paper:
“Physics” being presented in these unrefereed preprints is a travesty. The original paper has no obvious SC transition and the T< T_c resistivity is 100 times that of Cu. Southeast also has no transition, just instrumental artifacts. What is the goal here? No one can fool nature
Condensed Matter Theory Center of the University of Maryland about a claimed replication:
Very helpful @QM_phys_kyoto (thans) points out that Southeast may have drawn their figure misleadingly. On a linear scale, there seems to be no transition, very disappointing and not a good sign since the artifact also looms large
CMTC has high standards and we are exhausted
Now your farts will sound like cannon’s
Let two AI’s talk to each other and see if they find out that they both aren’t humans?
…I’m probably one of the leading drug legalization figures in my state.
But I’m also not an idiot who fetishizes weapons. You’re probably one of those weirdos who sleep with their gun.
Oh, and to help your tiny brain a bit: My drugs cannot kill you over a distance of 500 meters at a speed close to or faster than the speed of sound.
Additionally, countless of generations of humans have lived without any firearms at all. Even giant pussies like you are going to be fine.