Overthrowing the government is illegal

They could’ve solved that by making the block size larger, but instead did some weird ass replace-by-fee system.

Well, also, they just cut a deal with Marco Rubio to be America’s prison, so they must’ve figured that was more lucrative than Bitcoin and continuing to agitate the US by challenging the dollar was creating unnecessary friction.

Fuck Marty stratton

Absence of government; the state of society where there is no law or supreme power; a state of lawlessness; political confusion

https://gcide.gnu.org.ua/?q=Anarchy&define=Define&strategy=.

Whatever you’re arguing for, I’d suggest using another word

Absence of government; the state of society where there is no law or supreme power; a state of lawlessness; political confusion.

https://gcide.gnu.org.ua/?q=Anarchy&define=Define&strategy=.

Yeah this guy toying with selling is pretty insulting to anyone trying to help him out.

The funny thing is most foreign aid projects are implemented by American contracting companies. A very large percentage of the money stays in the US. Look up DAI, Chemonics, Abt Associates, etc.

What makes me think that is an anarchist community eschews political organization. There would be no way to arrange a competent defense.

Similar thoughts, trying to decide where to go

I already never intend to play it. I only care about single player. Hopefully this means the game is cheaper.

That’s funny because it’s not difficult at all to build an app like this. The value in buying such a business would be the scale of its user base, which is likely only several thousand at this point. And, if it were sold, most people would leave since most of those users are just dipping a toe in at this point to see what the app is like. Frankly, the content sucks. People are using this app out of goodwill and an interest in helping to build an alternative to the corpo apps. If dansup sells or does not open source, then that goodwill evaporates.

We would need power to do that. How do we get power? Don’t expect anyone else to do it for you.

What is anarchy then? Is it not some state in which everyone agrees not to take power?

Correct. So, what happens when you have, as you say, pure anarchy without rulers and then some folks interested in power notice that you have no organized way to defend yourself? They take the power easily. These people are often warlords. That’s why anarchy is so closely associated with such things, because anarchy is a power vacuum. That vacuum is easily filled. The most rudimentary thing that can fill it are warlords.

I don’t even understand the point you’re trying to make.

Why are they a myth?

? No, power vacuums can exist and are quickly filled by any group with a modicum of power. Look at ISIS. The US deposed the Iraqi government. The new government was weak and those with a stockpile of weapons and funding from other interested countries quickly swept in and took control.

US pulls out of Afghanistan. Before they can even board the plane, the Taliban has completely seized control.

No we’re talking about definitions. You’re advocating for anarchy being a viable state humankind, I’m saying practically you can’t enforce or defend its existence without turning it in to something that it is not by definition. It is practically impossible to defend a state of anarchy as it will and always has been overpowered by a more organized, hierarchical force.

Oh okay, thanks for that enlightening response.