When he is reporting something he is not straight up lying about he just skims the headline and then makes up stuff about it. You can sometimes see his brain work in real time, for example when he spots something in the body of the article that actually goes counter to his narrative he just yadda yaddas right past it and immediately moves on to something entirely different.
Well I don’t know about their piracy policies but I gather Dassault is more dangerous since they have the ability to drop heavy ordinance on you?
Sorry, I don’t have a real answer, just came here for the bad joke.
In Germany the city does that at least in smaller cities. Twice a year you can put all stuff that doesn’t go into regular trash out at the street and it gets collected. Think broken furniture, old electronics etc. People empty their garages and basements of all the stuff that accumulated. It’s common to have a walk through the neighborhood on these days to see if there is some cool stuff in there. Got my first skateboard that way as a teenager.
Fuck fuck fuck fuck FUCK fuck fuck fuck fuck FUCK fuck fuck fuck
If a guy went topless nobody would have given a fuck is the more appropriate comparison, the fact that you have to intentionally reach for the wrong example to make your point work is proof, that the people calling you misogynistic are not far off.
Wow, I totally misunderstood the headline.
I thought that because so many people listen to that caveman that exposes alarming low IQ.
Drake Lemar drama. Say that 10 times fast in a row.
Well at least Tucker was fired over it?
I thought all of them were from welcome to the jungle…
Nope. They’re right, you’re wrong.
You didn’t even give specific examples as you pretended to, it was just a blanket “both sides do it!” You just used more words.
And " the only answer to bad speech is more speech" is just factually and provable wrong. The Nazis and their enemies had free speech during the Weimarer Republik, they all used it extensively, the social democrats, the liberals, the communists, the clerics, the workers, the unions, they all used their right to free speech to try and fight the “bad speech” the Nazis could deploy openly, do you know how that story continues? They all lost their free speech because they were forced to let the cancer that is fascism roam free, with lies, propaganda, misinformation, calls for violence and just pure hate.
So the “bad speech” got plenty of “more speech” to counter but it didn’t change anything.
Ah, I was not aware thank you!
Is Cassettes a mistranslation? Or am I missing something here?
I like to drink a coffee and a glass of juice in the morning. I have put juice instead of milk in my coffee more often than I would admit.
They’re not even in the same packaging, one is a tetra pack, the other is a tall glass bottle.
My city is pretty flat, so I’d guess that they don’t need all powered axles? In the subways it happens more frequently on the longer trains, that are full, so during peak hours.
From what I experience on the subway and tram on rainy days is that starting from a stop is also tricky, since steel wheels on steel tracks have not a lot of grip on rainy days, leaves make it worse, so the wheels spin in place and it feels like a slow, rocky start.
So I figure they also drive a little slower overall not miss the stop.
It’s always fair to joke about the British.
Nah, that man faked cried on his show so regularly, I don’t believe he is capable to really cry, at least on air.
And the 'if real" statement (absolutely not real) is wrong - he wouldn’t cry because of the existential dread that naturally comes with processes like that, he would cry because of his persecution complex “uhuhu they’re so unfair to me” which arguably is worse.
Not because he is a whiny baby, but because all his rage and anger are so impotent.