![](/static/be9a2c79/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/a4cb9e53-9f83-42ea-ba63-49eb81a0e04c.jpeg)
Ok. But also - no it doesn’t.
“The mother acetifies the wine into vinegar.”
Not oxidises. Acetic acid is vinegar, formed from wine by the aerobic action of bacteria.
Ok. But also - no it doesn’t.
“The mother acetifies the wine into vinegar.”
Not oxidises. Acetic acid is vinegar, formed from wine by the aerobic action of bacteria.
“My” source?
That means it’s an aerobic bacterial process (aerobic - operating in the presence of air, or specifically oxygen in this case). Not oxidation, which is specifically the interaction of oxygen interactions with the molecule to bond preferentially over the existing bonds, “rusting” them in common parlance.
Well, now you’ve called it out, I’ve got to updeet it.
I’ve done that soul sucking job… You’re a saint. And I love those sorts of conversations.
I was home taught in the UK. Have a real love for learning that’s kick-started me into a career in computing that I’ve kept going for over two decades. Can’t stop, won’t stop reading, learning and improving. The number of colleagues I’ve had who just want a TL;DR on a new tech, software, plugin or system is too many. It’s our job to understand it, so we can build something so that others don’t have to. If you don’t want to understand, you’re in the wrong job role.
Coffee isn’t a tea, as you don’t boil it. If you boil it, you burn the coffee! That’s an extraction - you can steep it, but it’s better if you just push the water through at high pressure (which will royally screw up a tea).
Ah, pedantry in pedantry. So - now for Lemmy to tell me what I’ve gotten wrong :-D
That’s a bit stretched…
No you haven’t…
Challenger disaster
Ah cool, no worries. Hard to tell sometimes, and it’s better to admit you’re one of today’s 10,000 than be forever dumb :-D
Ok, I’m gonna guess I got whooshed by not knowing the source material of your response gif
Caught a cold - has ice in her hand.
According to the man(8) page, it will avoid touching any blocks that have the chattr -f
flag set, which is XSR_XFLAGS_NODEFRAG… So I think if the docs are still accurate to the code, yes.
A lot of ifs in that assumption.
I understood that XFS automatically mounted SSD’s with XFS_XFLAG_NODEFRAG set? Is this not the case?
That’s because the drive was written to its limits; the defrag runs a TRIM command that safely releases and resets empty sectors. Random reads and sequential reads /on clean drives that are regularly TRIMmed/ are within random variance of each other.
Source: ran large scale data collection for a data centre when SSDs were relatively new to the company so focused a lot on it, plus lots of data from various sectors since.
Gives me, “right you primitive screw heads” vibes.
I always remember that it’s eXtract Ze File, tar -xzf
… But I’ll be honest, I’ve not used it in years and years
You are rubber, I am glue!
Bernard Hill does look a lot alike in certain angles; never seen it before myself but you pointing it out and now I can’t not see it.