There it is.
The automatic assumption anyone disagreeing with you is a bot.
That last desperate cry of the boomer.
You.
What you don’t know.
You say that as if he has dementia, which he does not. Why can’t we accept that maybe the debate was a “bad day”? Why are we pretending it’s now the norm for how he behaves?
Because it isn’t a bad day. It was the standard for any time he isn’t in front of a teleprompter.
Has he ever been that, though? I’m pretty sure I’ve seen him speaking as much as any other president. I mean, the Dark Brandon stuff didn’t come out from him sitting behind his desk.
This is just delusional. Biden has given the least number of news conferences since Reagan. Huh, do you remember what they were covering up with Reagan again?
Why are we pretending that Biden is a whole different person than he was even one year ago over this? It’s so insidious.
We’re not. Most people just got to see what has been apparent for a while now.
Anthony Blinken is the worst secretary of state in my lifetime.
He is so incompetent that William Burns, the head of the CIA has been traveling all over the world for negotiations. Because Blinken is so bad, and not respected internationally.
Biden’s foreign policy has been an absolute disaster. Aided, in part, by his choice of an incompetent cabinet.
So, I guess what I’m saying is I’d like some of what you’re smoking. It seems like it is really really good for denial.
That wasn’t a stutter.
Describing it as such is such a “Don’t believe your lying eyes” comment that it does more to dissuade people from your viewpoint.
There’s 25 comments here.
One idiot here is the one living in a echo-chamber because they believe anyone with a different opinion is a bot or an idiot.
P.S. Don’t forget to re-enforce that echo chamber. I had an different opinion than yours on the definition of the words idiot and bot. that means I’ve got to be one or the other.
Sorry, I misread your comment as sarcastic.
I apologize for responding to you as I did.
They are not bound to lose.
That is a statement that is being pushed, along with the whole Biden “Over prepared” thing as a talking point to push why we have to stick with a dementia-addled genocidal asshole.
It’s simply not a true statement. You’re stating an opinion as fact, and it’s misleading as shit.
The second someone else gets picked is the second that they (Whoever they are) have name recognition and people will consider that person.
What does bipartisan mean again?
I apparently have to absolutely clear here:
The OP meme is mocking people claiming that the two parties are the same, because in one field (The number of convictions) they aren’t.
The OP meme mockingly asks people to tell it again how the parties are the same.
I’m LITERALLY doing that. And your response is “Yep, they are the same on that issue.”
No, we’re not.
The convention hasn’t happened yet.
Finally, the logic is simple. Biden is a genocidal fascist. If you’re afraid that we will live in a fascist state if Trump is elected, then my answer is we already do.
If Trump is elected and goes full fascist, what do you plan on doing? Whatever it is, you should already be doing it.
Are we supposed to be so virtuous that we allow Republicans to kill all of us just so we die with the Palestinians that no matter who we elect will die!? It makes absolutely no sense.
Resisting fascism and genocide isn’t about virtue. It’s about survival. You’ve been conned into believing that if you just vote for the lesser genocidal fascist, then you or whatever oppressed group you identify with will be fine. You will not.
This well known poem
First they came for the Communists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Communist
Then they came for the Socialists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Socialist
Then they came for the trade unionists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a trade unionist
Then they came for the Jews
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Jew
Then they came for me
And there was no one left
To speak out for me
is about you.
Oh, you are right about that.
He can’t. His only power over SCOTUS is nominating Justices in the event of a vacancy.
This is wrong. He can pack the courts RIGHT NOW. The Democratic party still holds the Senate. There is no requirement for there to only be nine justices.
Backing genocide isn’t better.
There is no harm-reduction past a certain point, there is just throwing vulnerable people under the bus to save yourself.
Convention hasn’t happened yet. It literally isn’t too late for that.
The Presidency is mostly a sock puppet for the military industrial complex. We aren’t catching lightning in a bottle there.
So, just to be clear, in matters involving the military industrial complex, both parties are the same?
Like the original post is asking to be reminded about in a snarky fashion obviously trying to imply that there is no way they’re the same?
Which party do I vote for that stops spending money on weapons or war?
Or, at the very fucking least, spent less money on weapons or war than the year before?
Everyone hates her for very good reasons.
There is a reason California didn’t vote for her.
At that level, Kamala is hated by her home state as well.
Yep, it was just a messaging problem, not a reality problem.
It certainly wasn’t that Clinton ran the most incompetent campaign in my lifetime. Ignoring the Midwest swing States, even as their local Democratic parties begged for support couldn’t have had anything to do with it.
Her support for war, from murdering Gaddafi and wanting to start ww3 with Russia over Syria, and voting for Iraq were all just historical notes of no importance to anyone.