I was pretty surprised by the barrenness of my wishlist. There’s been shockingly few titles I’ve been that excited about. Almost nothing in the AAA realm. And the few things that I am waiting to come out have been on that list for several years already…
Not a great month for companies with the word United in them…
This is the dumb kind of “best do nothing, because both no is perfect” approach to making sure no disincentives are ever taken because someone somewhere else might also try to do the illegal thing that they’ll lose access to the moment they’re caught…
I never suggested destroying the technology that is “AI”. I’m not uncomfortable about AI, I’ve even considered pivoting my career in that direction.
I suggested destroying the particular implementation that was trained on the illegitimate data. If someone can recreate it using legitimate data, GREAT. That’s what we want to happen. The tool isn’t the problem. It’s the method they’re using to train them.
Please don’t make up random ass narratives I never even hunted at, and then argue against them.
Not a single person is surprised
Country wide outage at the corruption involved with the health insurance
Health insurance industry: we can make it worse
That’s stupid. The damage is still done to the owner of that data used illegally. Make them destroy it.
But when you levy such miniscule fines that are less than they stand to make from it, it’s just a cost of business. Fines can work if they were appropriate to the value derived.
Lock the child rapist up.
Why is this even an argument? Republicans are disgusting sickos, letting this piece of shit roam around, actively protecting him.
If you can still use it after you stole it, as opposed to not being able to use it at all… Then it does give you an incentive
It wouldn’t be. It would still work. It just wouldn’t be exclusively available to the group that created it-any competitive advantage is lost.
But all of this ignores the real issue - you’re not really punishing the use of unauthorized data. Those who owned that data are still harmed by this.
Making it open source doesn’t change how it works. It doesn’t need the data after it’s been trained. Most of these AIs are just figuring out patterns to look for in the new data it comes across.
Yes, you’re all doing it wrong…by doing it at all.
But this poll is not about the percentage of the justice system that might be trustworthy. It’s about how many people thing the system is trustworthy, and if only 1/3 of the system is trying to make it trustworthy, then it demonstrably isn’t.
There’s at least 2 others worse than kavanaugh…
The US justice system has gone out of its way to make itself not trustworthy. It’s surprising it’s that high.
What deadlines? Squadron 42 was supposed to release in 2016…
That ship has sailed.
What dumbass is letting AI post articles without human oversight? That’s like rule one of what not to do.
He is certainly shows running it faster than I expected.
I thought we’d get a year or two in…until his dumbass tariff and tax plans kick in. Did not have “tank economy before taking office” on my bingo sheet
He has no official power, but a lot of current Republican congressmen are spineless little shits who will do anything he tells them to do. And apparently Elon wants the government shut down so bullied trump into pushing for it
I’ve always found it with that we just have these very important wires just lying there exposed on the sea bed… You’d think this kind of stack would have happened much more previously