• BigFatNips@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Lol not that. I’m well aware of that. I meant a source for “fingerprint readers are looking for an electrical signal too” as I’m very sure I’ve heard about them being defeated with a high enough quality reproduction of the finger (read: not flesh at all, let alone alive)

        • CoolGirl586@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Oh, I did a dumb. Capacitive readers use the body’s natural electrical signal to form an image of your fingerprint. You can trick them by using something conductive and running the right amount of electricity through.

          Dead people don’t work though. Not for very long at least.

          • piecat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Capacitive sensors don’t measure the body’s signals. Capacitance is a physical property of a material. The sensor puts out a signal and measures the response.

            I can use a gallon of milk to scroll my phone. Just tried.

          • Grippler@feddit.dk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Capacitive sensors are looking at capacitance of a material, everything has this not just living things and it certainly doesn’t require putting current through the material. You can for example get capacitive sensors for sensing the presence of cardboard, and they’re often used for detecting metal parts (obviously tuned to the specific material). This is also why water droplets mess up touch screens (and the biometric sensor), because it’s close enough to the capacitance of a finger (we’re mostly water after all) to trick it and create false triggers.