I’ll give the whole story if anyone wants it

  • swab148@startrek.websiteOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I like to tinker, plus I can be absolutely assured that every problem with my system is 100% my fault, which actually makes it easier to track down any problems. But the main reasons people use Arch is probably the rolling release model and the AUR.

    • vpklotar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yup, only reason I can’t move on is because of the AUR and the rolling release, though, having said that I’m thinking of trying NixOS but not quite sure it’s for me as it isn’t posix. It seems some software doesn’t really like that although I’ve heard it’s pretty awesome as a server OS.

      • swab148@startrek.websiteOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yeah, I could see it being a good server OS, but otherwise NixOS seems like it’s on the “immutable” thing that’s popular right now. I’ve tried a few immutable distros, and they’re not for me, I end up layering everything anyways lol

        • vpklotar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yhea, that’s my though. I wanna keep up to date and quite frequently change my system. I like having the reproducibility but feel like the immutable might get in the way. My servers though stay pretty static.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      It isn’t necessarily your fault as it is unstable software. It is going to break and fall apart. I feel like having a homelab is a much more productive way to tinker.

      • swab148@startrek.websiteOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Arch isn’t unstable, I just keep breaking things in my ignorance. The only thing in this scenario I could pin on Arch is that the “ca-certificates” package should have been marked as a dependency for pacman, but I guess it’s not strictly a dependency, as you can use pacman to install stuff from a local repo. Definitely for Firefox, though, as you can not browse the internet without the certs.