• T156@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Other companies? Companies also need things, so they would also need things to buy and sell. Buying and selling to each other doesn’t seem entirely unreasonable, particularly if the goods are non-physical. A company selling editing services for articles to a company that writes those articles for a news company who might be selling stocks to an investment company, and ad space to an ad company, etc.


    Realistically, though, that doesn’t tend to be that high a priority, or much of a long-term worry. Most of the concern these days seems to be focused more on the short-term profit more so than anything else, even if it will ultimately harm the company.

    Not that it would really matter for most, since a lot of the people who might otherwise be affected would likely be out and away by the time that that rolls around. It would barely affect them.

    • xavier666@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I remember in Interstellar, the Blight caused huge starvation among the poor causing them to riot. The government asked NASA to drop an orbital bomb on them but NASA refused, which caused the government to remove funding for NASA and close it publicly. It was just fiction then but it’s looking a bit grim now.

  • Damage@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Pathogens don’t really think of what will happen after the body they’re abusing dies

    • Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      They kind of do. (I am so sorry, not trying to be that guy).

      Look at HIV. The original strain is horribly deadly, but the strains that have evolved within the last decade are much more tame. It’s because the virus that kills its host doesn’t get to spread - Zombie outbreaks excluded here.

      The flu is the same way. New strains always emerge, but they are usually not fatal to most even without a vaccine.

  • markr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Everyone will be working multiple shitty service jobs that robots are not cost effective to automate. Our miserable wages will be just sufficient to keep the wheels on the cart from falling off.

  • wuphysics87@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    People will find other things to do that AI can’t. Like welding, or tapdancing, or sex work.

    • _core@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      You know we have robots that weld right now? And people are building basic sex robots? The idea that AI can’t replace a human is narcissistic hubris.

    • Grimy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      It sounds like the beginning of a cast system, I can’t imagine it not being abused in our current economic system. It’s also essentially welfare + a bit extra so you can actually live on it.

      How will this deal with home ownership and paying for your kids education? And then your kids end up bjeing stuck in the same situation they were born into with absolutely no wajy forward. It’s already like this in a sense but UBI is very likely to amplify it imo.

      • Steve@communick.news
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        It’s the same capitalism we have now; Accept the bottom income level, isn’t zero anymore.

        Who would be in what Cast?
        Where do you draw the lines?

        • Grimy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          My main fear is how this will affect renting and house ownership. Rents will probably go up as UBI comes into play and what’s left won’t be enough to save for any kind of down deposit. I doubt UBI will be enough for monthly mortgage payments in any case.

          It’s already very hard to move past the renting stage, I imagine it will be impossible once on UBI.

          The cast would be comprised of land and business owners. Again, it’s already almost the case, I just think UBI without careful considerations would amplify it.

          • Steve@communick.news
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Rents will probably go up […] and what’s left won’t be enough to save for any kind of down deposit.

            It’s the same capitalism we have now.

            Whatever it does to home and rent prices, as well as inflation generally, would be temporary until the markets adjusts. That can be softened by slowly phasing it in, maybe $100/m each year. The standard supply, demand, price balancing act at play. This time with the income floor not being at $0.

            • Grimy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              I completely agree with you. UBI is overall a good idea, I just think UBI alone won’t be enough to properly deal with massive job loss and certain aspects of our economic systems are going to greatly reduce its impact. It’s a very complicated problem and we have some serious decisions to make, it’s further complicated by the fact that the best solutions will probably end up dealing a blow to the billionaire class and big corporations and they will most likely fight tooth and nail to keep the status quo.

    • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Depending on the details of the system… Who cares?

      Sure, we can have a couple investigators working on gross abuse of the system, but we spend more money fighting social security and disability claims than it would cost to just pay every request.

  • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    They won’t, they’ll simply die and the market will slowly adjust to those with capital.

    This is all happening because we shot a gorilla in 2016 btw.

    • Zron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Don’t forget your sacred duty boys, dicks out for Harambe.

      It’s the only way to fix this fucked timeline

  • howrar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Why would we need anyone to buy things? Remember that money is an abstraction for resources. If you can do everything with AI, then you already have all the resources you need. Whether or not someone else needs what you produce is irrelevant when you already have access to everything you could want.

    • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeaaaah, the issue there is that, that is completely incompatible with our current system of capitalism. If we do not take deliberate steps to transform the system, it will collapse.

      • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        It’s no less compatible with capitalism than any other economic system. The idea that humans are no longer needed to do any kind of work is an issue the world has never faced before.

        • sparkle@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          Cymraeg
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I mean… it’s pretty compatible with leftist ideologies. Especially a moneyless form of socialism/communism

      • Deceptichum@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Good. The system is fucked.

        Let it collapse and we can work on a new system without hundreds of years of entrenched rich elites deciding it.

        • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Instead of collapsing like a phoenix and birthing a new better world, it will cause death, suffering, and turn us into some sort of fucked up techno fuedalism worse than we are now.

          I understand the nihilism, but we need to take the broken pieces we have now and reshape them into something better, not throw them out hoping things become better for no reason. They won’t.

          • Deceptichum@quokk.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            There is literally death, suffering, and we’re heading towards some sort of fucked up techno feudalism today. Like we don’t need a revolution for that, that’s the path we’re currently heading towards without one.

            Revolution isn’t pretty but just as when we overthrew monarchs, the end result and saving of future lives justifies it.

  • minorkeys@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Whoever still has money. Either importing wealthy immigrants to replace the American market or they’ll move their products to the markets that still have money.

    • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      War will be fought with AI too. It’ll be like that episode of Star Trek where each society’s AI battles the other and whatever death toll the computers calculate, that many citizens must report for euthanasia.