• atro_city@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    And some be saying exactly this while exposing themself like that. Did you think I was talking about all women?

    • Ephera@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      In my mind, it is significantly more likely that someone on the internet is a misogynist rather than them talking about the miniscule overlap between women not wanting to be objectified and women posing in manners that commonly get objectified. In the latter case, I would also expect that someone to be aware of the prevalence of misogynists and therefore distance themselves from them, so as to not be misunderstood. The downvotes you got seem to agree with me.

      • atro_city@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        and “my prejudice is justified” but at the same time “not all women”.

        Steadfast principles, I see.

        • Ephera@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Congratulations on technically not being wrong, I guess? I was admitting that, yeah, I made certain assumptions there. At the same time, I tried to provide you feedback that your communication attempt was evidently not successful. But rather than reflecting on that, you’re completely blocking that off. Rather than communicating, you’re just looking to prove that I’m a dumbass and you’re not. Was that first comment intentionally ambiguous, so you could prove you’re technically not wrong? Is that your thought of a good time? Because fucking hell, it is not for me.

    • leds@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Why do you think that is exposing? What is that exposing and why do you think that is a problem?