• CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Remember, according to the RW, something something deep state radical leftist tyranny of Merrick Garland, etc…

  • crusa187@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Garland is trash. Sat on his hands for over 2 years before being forced into prosecuting Trump, but too little too late and now nothing will come of it. Again has a chance to restore some justice in this nation by taking on the obviously corrupt Supreme Court, and again chooses to do nothing.

    Biden could replace him, but for some reason keeps calling him John Mitchell and then just trails off staring at the floor…

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Overall, despite a handful of good calls, Garland has been a catastrophically huge disappointment in the scope of trying to shore up our defenses against fascism. In fact, I’d go so far as to say that his nomination to AG is amongst one of Biden’s worst appointment decisions.

    • MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I would agree. Biden has had some really solid appointments overall (Love me some Lina Khan), but Garland has just not gotten the job done.

  • mysticpickle@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Methinks the chap still hopes to be on the supreme court one day and isn’t looking to piss off a potential future colleague.

  • Drusas@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’m increasingly convinced that the corporate/authoritarian movement in the US will not be overcome until heads literally roll. I’m not endorsing this. But I don’t see another way forward when we have elites who are immune from any sort of ethics guidelines or having to meet the needs of constituencies.

  • John Richard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    They should investigate all crimes, but I’d be pissed at the Biden campaign if I were Garland. Republicans held him in contempt and were calling for Garland’s arrest while Biden campaign insisted Biden didn’t have memory issues. Now it gives the appearance that Garland was shielding Biden.

  • jonne@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Look at what you get when you try to appease Republicans by appointing a federalist society judge to be AG in exchange for 0 Republican votes.

      • Ashyr@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        He is not. If he were, why would the republicans have stonewalled his nomination for Supreme Court Justice? It doesn’t make sense.

        He has participated in some events, like debates, with the federalist society, but he is not a member.

        Do all the research in the world and you will not find any connection there.

        • 242@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          They stonewalled him because they were determined to block anyone Obama nominated. He put up a milquetoast right leaning centrist as an act of conciliation. They didn’t give a shit. They would have blocked anyone Obama nominated.

          • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            No you weren’t, their argument is specious at best.

            why would the republicans have stonewalled his nomination for Supreme Court Justice? It doesn’t make sense.

            Republicans blocked their own bills, and bills they dropped over because the Democrats supported it.

            Republicans have no morals, ethics or values outside of power, so assuming they wouldn’t vote against the exact shit they want out of spite just means you’re not paying attention enough.

            E: the federalist part is correct tho, he’s not one of them afaik.

            • Ashyr@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              You’re applying the behavior of Republicans under Trump in 2024 to their behavior in 2016 under Mitch McConnell, which is not a fair way to interpret history.

              The Republicans’ primary goal has always been to consolidate power, a strategy evident even before Trump’s influence. This was evident in 2016 when McConnell blocked Merrick Garland’s appointment. It wasn’t just about denying Obama a win; it was about maintaining control over the Supreme Court. By holding the position open, they ensured a conservative majority with Gorsuch’s appointment in 2017.

              While their actions under Trump have often seemed erratic and without principle, the decision to block Garland was a calculated, strategic move rooted in the same pursuit of power. Viewing their behavior solely through the lens of recent events, like the border bill, ignores the broader, consistent strategy they have employed over the years.

              The move to block Garland was a clear demonstration of their long-term strategy to secure judicial power, not an isolated act of obstructionism. This context is crucial for understanding the continuity in their approach to power, rather than seeing it as a sudden shift in behavior.

              • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                They behaved in very similar ways back then too, remember when McConnell himself filibustered his own bill once Democrats supported it back on 2015?

                It’s a decade+ long pattern of behavior, they’ve only gotten worse about it and stopped trying to hide the shit they’ve been doing already.

        • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          The GOP have stonewaleld bills THEY WROTE once they realized Democrats wanted to pass it. They obstructed a border bill beyond their wildest dreams because it was under Biden. That question isn’t really a mystery.

          • Ashyr@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            This isn’t a bill and this wasn’t 2024. Mitch McConnell was responsible for stonewalling Garland’s appointment to the supreme court. Trump was responsible for killing the bill. Trump is an idiot, McConnell is just evil. They don’t play the same way at all. They almost certainly would have passed that legislation if Trump hadn’t interfered.

            It was a lifetime appointment to the most powerful position in the country, assuming you have a like-minded majority. If he were a federalist, it would have been a gift to them on a silver platter.

            We’re dealing with counterfactuals here, but attributing their increasingly irrational behavior today to all their actions in the past is a terrible way to interpret history.

  • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I think everyone has sufficient evidence to arrest Clarence Thomas. I’m not even a lawyer and I think I could get a conviction on tax fraud for the tour bus loan that got forgiven.

  • Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Garland deserves to be remembered as someone who could have saved rule of law, but didn’t have the courage to do so. People should spit should they ever be forced to utter the craven coward’s name.

  • Queue@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Even when they can go for the removal of fascist enablers through legal means they refuse to. God damn it.

  • hark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Garland is the weak-ass supreme court pick that was a result of “reaching across the aisle”. I’m not sure why he was given the AG role, but democrats should pick people actually willing to fight for us. Democrats positioned themselves as “the only thing stopping fascism” but they don’t even try.

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Democrats positioned themselves as “the only thing stopping fascism” but they don’t even try.

      You can’t keep the greed game going if you’re on the sidelines. Gotta keep us voting for these inept dumbasses or they won’t be able to enrich themselves!

      I hate how we have 2 choices:

      100% farm to table fascism

      or

      80% Corpo stooge 15% inept stooge 5% actually gives a shit about people.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        5% actually gives a shit about people

        We have to balance the budget! There’s simply no money left for giving a shit about people.

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Democrats positioned themselves as “the only thing stopping fascism” but they don’t even try.

      They seem to be there just to have the sand kicked into their face first.

    • Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I like about 80-90% of what Biden’s done. But he and his generation of Dems don’t put as high a priority as they should n fighting to improve the lives of us little people. Should we avoid a fascist dictatorship and Biden gets 4 more years, replacing Garland has to be a top priority

  • 5in1k@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    So the republicans are so criminal we can’t investigate them because of optics. I hate the government. Top to bottom.

  • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    They will only investigate the UAW because they called for a ceasefire in Gaza.

    What a joke this is.