The Spanish government has a plan to prevent kids from watching porn online: Meet the porn passport.

Officially (and drily) called the Digital Wallet Beta (Cartera Digital Beta), the app Madrid unveiled on Monday would allow internet platforms to check whether a prospective smut-watcher is over 18. Porn-viewers will be asked to use the app to verify their age. Once verified, they’ll receive 30 generated “porn credits” with a one-month validity granting them access to adult content. Enthusiasts will be able to request extra credits.

You have to request more porn credits from the government if you need more? Don’t want the government to be tracking this data of you. This is a privacy issue

  • doctortofu@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    It’s always porn, isn’t it? We don’t need to protect children from misinformation, fascism, violence, racism, discrimination or exploitation on the internet, it’s always just porn for some reason…

  • golden_zealot@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Wow good job Spain.

    I guess this works because email doesn’t exist.

    I guess this works because file sharing applications and websites don’t exist.

    I guess this works because VPN’s free and paid don’t exist.

    I guess this works because Tor, i2p, Freenet, and Yggdrasil don’t exist.

    I guess this works because torrenting doesn’t exist.

    I guess this works because black markets don’t exist.

    I guess this works because chat applications don’t exist.

    To be a fly on the wall of these government meetings where they talk about this shit would surely be the funniest fucking thing in the world.

    • themurphy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      You are right, it’s really stupid.

      But it’s also stupid not to consider, that it’s not the real reason they made this in the first place.

      They want to track you, and porn is the first excuse. If this is a success you might need this passport for alot of other things.

      • pdxfed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Thank you for contributing!

        You’ve used the last of your political observation credits for the month. If you’d like to request more, please visit yourcountry.gov citizen portal and fill out the application. Your wait time will be 3-5 business days. We apologize for the wait but we are currently receiving a high volume of applications.

        -govbot

    • VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I want to be at the meeting a year from now where they realize only two people have ever signed up ‘Yay we fixed porn!’

      Buy who am I kidding they brought VPN shares before this was introduced

      • No_Eponym@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Bought VPN shares and water shipping company shares because they know wasting money on this shit instead of on public infrastructure to provide more reliable clean water is only good for commercial interests.

  • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    What gets me about this is that, while it would still be bad, they could have mostly avoided the privacy nightmare here with some kind of Zero Knowledge Proof scheme, but the tracking is obviously part of the point.

    • CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      You think govt officials can ingest, articulate, or even fathom what ZKrollups are?

      We have the wrong people in govt unfortunately. Its mostly lawyers.

      But yea, some sort of ZK schema would be interesting. Still dislike the porn credits tho.

  • Majestic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I wish they would just push all the big mainstream porn sites to remove the most abusive misogynistic content rather than slapping these checks on everything.

    Also this will never be okay until there is a zero knowledge version that means neither the government, nor the sites, nor any other party can establish a given person’s habits which is probably not something they’ll ever do because tracking is probably part of the point.

    I’m not a fan of the easy access to porn that kids have or the proliferation of the industry in general but I am worried that as part of this harmless things like erotic roleplaying websites will be swept up as part of it and well I use those. And their point is not porn though some people host and share porn as part of it (which is why it’d get swept up with it eventually probably), it’s about writing, smutty, erotic writing. And I’d rather not have to tie my identity to my desires to roleplay out an elf who ends up at a gangbang with the wolf-men tribe to my real life identity (I’m not claiming that’s something I do there but it’s an example of something that would be kind of embarrassing for others to know and it’s far from the weirdest stuff that goes on in places like that).

    Government having credits for how often I could say log in and continue a long-term erotic writing campaign with someone is just weird but that’s the end point of this kind of thing. Having credits seems not helpful anyways, the true porn addicts are just going to download stuff then share it in private forums, discords, p2p, etc. If the point is to stop kids from accessing this the credits thing seems odd.

    • delirious_owl@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Lol most porn is made in the US. How is Spain supposed to regulate US porn streaming companies showing content filmed and distributed by US companies?

        • intensely_human@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          I wonder how one would find an exhaustive list of porn sites. Using a blacklist seems like a hard problem because of discovery here.

          • Raphaël A. Costeau@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Obviously, no censorship measure can reach all cases, especially when it comes to pornography, you can find it in every corner of the internet. But it can cover most cases if it targets the most popular sites. For example, there is a lot of child pornography on the surface web, despite it being banned in most countries, but the ban makes access difficult and guarantees punishment in any case that the law takes notice of. It is not a definitive strategy, as it aims at the effect and not the cause, but it is something.

  • Ilandar@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I don’t think this is that bad compared to the alternatives I’ve seen (it doesn’t tie your identity to the content you’re viewing, only the use of your credits) but I would be curious to know if the government is also reexamining its sex education curriculum and delivery at the same time. Banning porn won’t magically improve the attitudes of young people (particularly men) towards their sexual partners.

    • Canary9341@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      (it doesn’t tie your identity to the content you’re viewing, only the use of your credits)

      The website can’t know this, but the government can easily (and I bet will) link an identity to a token, and know where and when it is used. It can also request metadata on usage of a token, which websites will no doubt want to store.

      That the government can track this sort of thing is bad enough, but I’m especially concerned that it or both parties will leak/share/sell their databases, allowing anyone to do the same.

      • Ilandar@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Why do you assume they will? From the design document it sounds like that’s not how it will work. You mentioned data leaks but it sounds like there is no history log to leak.

    • whotookkarl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I think this is bad because it doesn’t solve any problems (efficacy of age verification systems is questionable at best) and introduces new problems (token system violates privacy). Censorship under governments creates black markets and reduces privacy at taxpayer expense. If they are concerned about child safety maybe they should start with what studies show are the most effective ways to accomplish that goal as opposed to ineffective, expensive wastes of time.

  • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    If your worst-case scenario for lax online identity is that kids might watch porn… I don’t give a shit if kids watch porn.

  • nicerdicer@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    When you are out of porn credits before the end of the month, you can go to the good ol’ simulator: