When you compare Biden to Trump vs. the effects on the Palestinians, were Trump president again, he would not just help the Israelis exterminate the Palestinians, but encourage them to do so quickly- as he’s already told Bibi to “finish it”. So your dichotomy is more than a bit disingenuous .

  • ceenote@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    It didn’t all happen in 2016. Fascists have been quietly diminishing the power of the electorate for decades now. We’ll keep on having “the most important election of our lifetimes” until we manage to undo the damage. IF we manage to undo the damage.

  • The Assman@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Too young to remember how bloodthirsty Hilary was as secretary of state. Member when “we came, we saw, he died tehe”?

    • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      A lot of retrospective handwringing forgets this, or the vile comments that came out during Bill’s multiple sexual assault allegations.

      Hillary was not the right candidate to fight Trump, Jeb Bush more likely. After Obama, returning to an establishment candidate was a mistake, and I don’t care if “it’s her turn” after stepping aside in 2008. Politics has real consequences for people who don’t vacation in the Hamptons.

    • vonbaronhans@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah I’m not sure how to take this post. The image is clearly both-sides-ism but the text of OPs post on it appears to be calling that bad.

      This posting format makes sense in specific subreddit/communities like /leopardsatemyface or /whitepeopletwitter. But here it just makes it unclear what the intended message is.

    • Narauko@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      If the choice is between genocide and genocide + fascism, and there is no viable option 3 without genocide, then the argument is still embrace the genocide or democracy ends. The alternative is embrace genocide and who really needs all this democracy anyway?

  • whygohomie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    If he had more votes in the primary, then that could have been true despite the superdelegates. As it would be true for any other candidate.

    But he/they didn’t, and here we are moping over something that didn’t happen years ago while the USSC lays the final stones in the foundation for an actual dictatorship.

    Bold strategy. Let’s see how that works out.

  • FreakinSteve@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    What we learned without any doubt was that the Democrat Party does NOT represent the people; only their own power and clubhouse alumni. They proved that they were exactly who the fascists said they were. Fast forward to today, and Joe is telling me what he’ll do to stop fascism in his next term if I give him money to do the job he already gets paid to do, but wont do a goddamn thing to stop fascism RIGHT NOW WHILE HE HAS THE POWER. To my first point: Joe has been in DC SINCE 1972.

    • MrMcGasion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      As someone who voted 3rd party in 2016 and regrets it. While you are technically correct, the last 8 years have shown that there is so much more on the line than what I was protesting against with my 3rd party vote. I didn’t like Hillary Clinton’s positions on war. And sure, my vote probably wouldn’t have mattered all that much as I live in a very red state, but every time the Supreme Court does some bullshit, I feel a bit of regret that I didn’t use my vote to support the best candidate who actually had a chance.

  • JimmyBigSausage@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Millenials, Xers, and Zoomers don’t understand the realities of reality. Bernie wasn’t going to get elected. Would not vote for Hillary. So we all got Trumped. That’s it, plain and simple. Ok back to your computers and phones. You won’t ever take to the streets, or ever get mad because you have never been angry enough to. So instead of doing anything, you’ll just downvote me into oblivion to help calm your non-anger.

    • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Just straight up memory-holed the summer of 2020? And the election I guess, since people did turn out and Clinton got more votes than Trump? Let me know how blaming people for living in an undemocratic system works for hyping up voters.

  • at_an_angle@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    My side didn’t win, and the country is doomed is such a shit take. Multiply that by 10 because it’s coming from Twitter.

        • StinkySocialist@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Bernie would definitely outperform Biden. This is just a fact. Left-Wing candidates do better with higher voter turnout. They get higher voter turnout when people are actually excited about the person they’re voting for, especially young people. Young people hate Biden. You can see this from all the protests about the genocide and Palestine he’s enabling. Will have low voter turnout compared to Bernie. Biden might lose the election giving us Trump again.

          Don’t mean to tell you what you already know a stranger. Just saw you being gaslit and wanted you to know that you’re not crazy 👈😎

          • Adub@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Yeah, how did the Bernie magic work out for Jamaal Bowman? Somehow he is the best candidate but can’t get people to attend a rally for an incumbent Democrat let alone vote for him.

            • StinkySocialist@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              Have you considered that? Maybe the amount of attention Americans give the presidential election is many times more than any other election? Do you think Americans are more likely to know the current president and who they ran against In the last election than their own senator? Or their own member of the House of reps?

              Do you think that might affect things?

              Be serious my dude

  • wieson@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    There are some elections between 1929 and 1939 that would be more consequential.

    • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      In exchange for raising money and investing in the DNC, Hillary would control the party’s finances, strategy, and all the money raised… This victory fund agreement, however, had been signed in August 2015, just four months after Hillary announced her candidacy and nearly a year before she officially had the nomination.

      Emphasis mine. It was a captured field, with a performative primary - Hillary/‘s campaign abused their position against a broke DNC and elevated herself above all others.

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Emphasis mine. It was a captured field, with a performative primary - Hillary/‘s campaign abused their position against a broke DNC and elevated herself above all others.

        Supreme court also ruled that this was fine and very cool, very legal.

    • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      This is why young people need to vote in every election especially the local ones, even the ones that seem insignificant like a school board election. The only way for a Bernie to win a primary is if such a candidate is not an outlier. The entire party needs to move to the left and that starts from the ground up. Since people need to get exposed to more left wing politicians so left wing ideology becomes more normalized and at the moment it’s not.

      When young people vote you get people like AOC and Omar into office. The only way to get a Bernie elected is if there are AOC’s and Omar’s filling seats in local, state and the federal government. From the school board all the way up to the Senate.

  • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’ve always held that Bernie deserved better than his supporters.

    The one time he actually needed all that energy and noise and the shitbags turned out with all the enthusiasm of a deadbeat dad being asked to come to parent teacher night.

    Millenials and Zoomers turning out at population share at the primary would have made it a landslide for him. They couldn’t even do that much, nevermind the easy dominating overrepresented share they could take with all the boomers catching the MAGA brainrot.

    • SynonymousStoat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Nah, Bernie deserved better than the backroom deals that kept him from ever having a fair chance at getting the nomination.

      • bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Bernie lost at the ballot box ultimately. The reason he couldn’t make any backroom deals is because he spent his time attacking the Democratic Party the entire primary both times. I don’t understand why people expected them to shake his hand as he continuously spat in theirs.

        I am a fan of Bernie. I volunteered for one of his campaigns. But it is always surprising to me how people forget the game he played. He wanted to be a revolutionary, to be a massive wind of change and take down the Democrat establishment. He described them as corrupt and awful at every single campaign stop. What the hell did people expect other than the Democrat establishment being upset about that? He’s not even a Democrat, he’s an independent who joined their party for the purpose of trying to get the nomination. Fair play, and obviously the only realistic way he had a shot at being president, but he is by every definition an outsider to the party - which we loved about him! But why on earth would they warmly embrace him?

      • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        You mean like the delegate system that actually benefited him disproportionate to the share of the vote he got?

        Or how apparently not letting a candidate pull the nomination with a minority of support is some grand conspiracy of moderate candidates by collectively having more support than him?

        Or any number of other reason why the fact that you spent primary day flicking your boogers at the ceiling to see if any of them would stick has nothing to do with Bernie not having as much primary support as his campaign events would suggest?

    • pwalshj@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      We could have had Bernie if the NY Board of Elections didn’t purge all newly registered Democrats despite complying with the October 9th deadline. They erased over 120,000 in Brooklyn alone. The fix was in.

      • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        The fix was in but easily surmountable by just fucking turning out.

        DNC meddling is a fucking boogeyman, only 30 million people voted in the primaries, y’all fucking flaked and won’t deserve a leader like him again until you all fucking own that y’all abdicated.

        The best excuse y’all could possibly have is that the DNC meddling boogeyman actually spooked you out of participating. Then at least you’re just a moron instead of being pathetic too.

    • bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Millennials and Zoomers turning out at population share at the primary would have made it a landslide for him. They couldn’t even do that much, nevermind the easy dominating overrepresented share they could take with all the boomers catching the MAGA brainrot.

      First off, Gen Z was born between 1995 and 2012, which means only a small % of them could even vote in 2016 (1995-1998) and 2020 (1995-2002). Even 2020 we’re talking less than like 30% of the generation was even old enough to vote. In 2016 it was like 12-15%? So I would take a step back for a second and think through this blanket statement of yours on that alone. 6 years out of 17 won’t be able to vote this coming election, so we’re talking (napkin math) like 70% of the generation is even eligible in 2024. I hope my point has been sufficiently made here.

      Second, why is it the responsibility of Gen Z and Millennials to save everyone else, or rather - why is it our fault when other people vote for Trump? Why didn’t Gen X vote for him? Why are boomers off the hook? It’s not Gen Z and Millenials’ collective fault that other people voted for Trump. That’s absurd.

      This just gives me flashbacks to Republicans in 2016 essentially saying “well you forced me to vote for Trump when you all [insert social issue they are mad about]” as if they aren’t responsible for their own actions and it’s everyone else’s fault they voted for the bigoted conman.

      • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I love how you just came right the fuck out and admitted you expect everyone else to do the revolution for you but tried to phrase it like never turning out is some kind of virtue.

        • bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          I’m not sure I follow…? Are you responding to the right person?

          Gen Z could barely vote for Bernie in the primaries. Holding them accountable for “not turning out“ when it was literally impossible for them to is a pretty bold take.

          I am responsible for a vote and who I support. That doesn’t make it by fault when someone else votes for a different candidate.

          • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Both Gen Z and Millenials underperformed share of the voting age population. Millions of both actively chose to just not show up the one time it mattered.

            Your right that it ain’t your fault when other people vote for someone else, but the Bernie crusaders have NEVER owned up to that being 99% of what happened both times around, other people voted for someone else, and that number of other people was well surmountable by turning out at voting age share at a minimum, let alone how much more young voters could take in over representation if they could be fucking bothered to do anything but get mad at other people for not voting the way the non voters wanted them to.