• Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    tl;dr “Misandry is perfectly fine because men are evil and nothing a woman has ever done is wrong.”

    The problem isn’t that the bottom scenario isn’t accepted, it’s that the top scenario is. No one should be showing off nudes of children in public, or anywhere really, regardless of gender. It’s weird, it’s sick, and it has no place in this world.

    • Nicoleism101@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      There’s nothing wrong about nude children or any other human old or young. Just go to a beach in Europe…

      Yes Americans are weird about this thanks to years of well… catholic brain rot

      • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Nude adult humans = Nothing wrong Nude children = “Hi, I’m Chris Hansen with dateline NBC”

        Children do not belong on a nude beach

        • Nicoleism101@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Well you have no idea then. Here no one cares. It’s normal and nothing sexual about it

          And not even on the nude beach either on a normal beach too there’s hordes of nude children running about. I am waiting for your head to explode now

        • Malfeasant@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Such a weird thing to say … when I was little ('70s) it was not uncommon for kids to swim nude, we didn’t care… Any adults who are ogling kids aren’t going to stop just because of one layer of clothing.

      • barsoap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        If you’re taking photos on a nude beach in Europe you’re getting decked. Kid, adult, doesn’t matter.

        There’s a massive fucking difference between sitting naked in a sauna with other naked people and sitting on public transit, fully dressed, gossiping about non-consensual nudes of children. How is that even a question. How are you capable of equating those things.

    • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s weird, it’s sick, and it has no place in this world.

      Only if you think a naked body = sex, which is a weird assumption to make if you think about it.

      • wavebeam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Except the comic doesn’t show them discussing or showing a naked body, it’s a weirdo pointing out the genitals to another person in a very public place. If it was toes, it’d be fine. If it was just a naked body it’d be whatever, mostly. But they’re specifically pointing out genitals, that implies sexual focus. It’s only “cute” and “funny” for the old women here because eventually it’ll be an organ used for sex…

      • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Because the only time it’s appropiate for two people to be naked together is when dey fucking?

      • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Nah, it should never be acceptable to show photos of people naked to your friends without their express permission. Outside of medical professionals of course.