• Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    drawings

    Nobody said anything about drawings, but interesting default argument… Thanks for telling the class that you’re a lolicon pedo.

    the liberty of masses be stomped and murdered

    Nobody said that anyone should be stomped and murdered, so calm down, lmao. We’re just saying that child porn producers, consumers, and apologists are vile, disgusting perverts who should be held accountable for their crimes against children.

      • magi@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        They’re making them unsafe? You and your bullshit are making them unsafe. Every comment you post reeks of your true character. Go get help.

        • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          I’m making kids unsafe by…

          checks notes

          …being firmly and unwaveringly against the sexual exploitation of children.

          I really can’t stress enough that this was an actual 15 year old girl who was pornified with AI. This isn’t some “erotic drawings” argument, the end results were photorealistic nudes with her unmodified face. This isn’t some completely AI generated likeness. Pictures of her from social media were exploited to remove her clothes and fill in the gaps with models trained on porn. It was nonconsensual pornography of a kid.

          Anyone who read this story, and feels the need to defend what was done to this girl is a fucking monster.

          I can’t believe that the person defending sex crimes of this magnitude is a fucking mod.

                • magi@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  Refute literally anything I said? My post history in this thread, mostly replying to you, is still present. My absurdity? You’ll go down as the laughing stock you are right now. Only need to take a quick look around this thread to realize your view on this is unpopular. “this is Lemmy”, yeah, and apparently people like you still exist on the internet. You’re defending/playing down the production and consumption of photorealistic sexual imagery depicting a REAL underage girl.