It was nice knowing Raspberry Pi while they lasted. Going to suck losing something that has changed the homegrown embedded system hobby forever.

    • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      The Pi5 is already a shitshow with crazy power usage requiring a special power supply instead of a normal USB C phone charger.

      • Valmond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        26 days ago

        Yeah I’d take a 3b-ish PI for say 30€ any day (IDK if that’s realistic pricing). If I need beefy hardware I just use a PC?

        • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          26 days ago

          The Pi4 had a good price on release. Then Covid hit.

          With the Pi5 the Pi foundation is just milking it. Overpriced chip on an inefficient outdated 28nm process node.

      • Lettuce eat lettuce@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        26 days ago

        We’re lucky that the SBC space has gotten really solid over the last couple years. ARM-based, X86-based, and even some RISC-V systems.

        The PI isn’t the only only game in town now, and actually gets beat in several different applications depending on use case.

        As shareholder value and line-must-go-up takes over the company culture, progress and innovation will happen more and more in the hands of companies and orgs that actually care about their product’s quality and features.

        Still disappointing though, the Pi was my first introduction to IoT and low power computing.

    • NotAnotherLemmyUser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      Then it’s a good thing that no countries have pure capitalism for their economy.

      We need regulation on corporations to keep them in check.

      • JoJo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        26 days ago

        then it’s a good thing that no countries have pure capitalism for their economy

        America: 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🦅🦅🦅

        • NotAnotherLemmyUser@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          26 days ago

          America doesn’t have a pure capitalist economy.

          A pure capitalist economy would have a free market system with no government intervention.

          Almost every country has a mix between capitalism and socialism for their economies.

          A pure capitalist economy is terrible just as much as a pure socialist economy would be terrible.
          The trick is finding the right balance between the two.

          • Wrrzag@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            26 days ago

            Regulated capitalism is still capitalism. There’s no such thing as “pure” or “impure” capitalism, the social relationships to capital are the same. Lassiez-faire capitalism is just a flavour of it.

            It’s like ice-cream: you may prefer chocolate ice-cream over vanilla ice-cream, but they are both flavours of ice-cream and you wouldn’t say “yea, that’s not pure ice-cream”. Some people may even dislike ice-cream altogether and prefer cheesecake.

            • NotAnotherLemmyUser@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              26 days ago

              Imagine a scale, on one end is a market economy where the government does not regulate it in any way, and does not own any part of it in any way. This is pure capitalism/laissez fair capitalism, whatever you want to call it. And you are correct, it does not exist today in any country (and that’s a good thing in my opinion).

              On the other end of that scale would be an economy that is completely controlled/owned/regulated by the government (for example, communism).

              In economic terms, every country falls on that scale with some balance between a completely free market economy and how much regulation they impose as well as what kind of industries they control/own.

              If someone is going to blame capitalism for “ruining everything” they are basically asking for a market system where everything is controlled/owned by the government. Where monopolies are rampant, and the citizens have no choice except for what the government or dictatorship has decided. In my opinion, this is also a bad choice.

              If I am wrong about what they are asking for, feel free to point out the economy of a country that they are saying we should follow. In other words, if not capitalism, what are you asking for?

          • exanime@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            26 days ago

            In America, the government intervention is whatever corporations pay politicians to say and do… it’s actually worse than pure Capitalism and they managed, through regulatory capture, to turn the government against the people or competition for their paymasters

          • kboy101222@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            26 days ago

            Government doing things ≠ socialism.

            Government regulating things ≠ socialism

            Roads and parks ≠ socialism

            Socialism is based in the collective ownership of companies by the workers who make everything happen, rather than execs and managers. Socialism isn’t when government does stuff or when healthcare.

            • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              26 days ago

              I like how enraged you were that your comment just abruptly ends. It comes off like you were ranting in front of a microphone and got so worked up you walked away mid-rant. Just ranting down the hallway, and down the street…but we don’t hear it, because you’re away from the microphone.

            • NotAnotherLemmyUser@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              26 days ago

              I’m just going off of the definition here:

              https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/socialism

              any of various egalitarian economic and political theories or movements advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods.

              We definitely don’t have a pure capitalist economy since that would mean that there is no government intervention in the market.

              And we do have parts of the economy that are owned/run by the government as socialism would suggest.

              What would you call it, if not a mix of capitalism and socialism? Maybe a mix of Capitalism and Communism would be more accurate?

              This article would seem to suggest that: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/e/economy.asp

          • LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            26 days ago

            Youre thinking of laissez-faire capitalism, maybe even libertarian capitalism?

            America is absolutely capitalist in every sense of the term. The entire nation is corporatized and the government has no particularly influential anti-capitalist entities. Both competing parties are capitalist. The social framework by which we raise children is structured to indoctrinate them into the ideologies of neoliberalism and American economic exceptionalism. The propaganda that American society is meritocratic is enforced throughout our entire lives, all with the aim of suppressing the class consciousness of the working class.

            People are responding to you with derision because what you’re saying doesn’t make any sense. Capitalism and socialism are not based entirely on hard rules. They’re both economic ideologies and social philosophies packaged into cultural frameworks. America is actively anti socialist. They have a very long history of anti communism and anti workers’ rights. America is the holotype of post-Reagan neoliberal capitalism. It is one of the worst countries in the world in terms of wealth disparity and income inequality. It is one of the least regulated economic powers in history, with it being open knowledge that billionaires rule the country and can essentially do anything they want without facing any kind of material consequences.

            • NotAnotherLemmyUser@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              26 days ago

              When I say pure capitalism, yes, I’m referring to laissez faire capitalism.

              I can’t think of any countries that currently have that, and I don’t think we should want that.

              Socialism is likely not the best term here, but when I’m referring to it economically I mean in the sense that the government has ownership of some businesses and is regulating other businesses as opposed to what would happen with laissez-faire capitalism.

              Perhaps it is better to say that the U.S. is a mix between Capitalism (a market economy) and Communism (a command-based economy) as this article explains? https://www.investopedia.com/terms/e/economy.asp

              It is one of the worst countries in the world in terms of wealth disparity and income inequality.

              That has not been my experience when visiting/living in other countries, but I am curious if you have some data to back this statement up?

              Although I do agree that we have a problem with wealth disparity and income inequality.

              I think we should look to other countries that have much higher levels of happiness (Such as Sweden) compared to the U.S. and try to imitate what they are doing.

              Even in the case of looking to economies like what Sweden has, it is still a mixed economy. So completely doing away with capitalism is not something we should be striving for.

              • LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                26 days ago

                There is no aspect of the US that is in any sense communist. Communism refers very specifically to a style of government which directly owns and controls the means of production across all forms of industry. This style of government is controlled by the proletariat. That is not the case for any industry in the US. The link you provided is propaganda not based on any actual communist beliefs. Communism is not a “command based” anything, it is a philosophy with regards to the distribution of the means of production and how the fruits of the working class’s labor should be shared.

                https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/gini-coefficient-by-country

                The US gini coefficient is 39.8 as of 2021. Making it one of the worst countries in the world for income inequality. There are plenty of areas in the southern states especially where entire towns are below the poverty line, some very significantly below it.

                • NotAnotherLemmyUser@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  26 days ago

                  Well the U.S. isn’t entirely capitalist either.

                  On one extreme you have a completely free market economy. On the other extreme you have an economy that’s completely controlled by the government (such as Communism).

                  A pure free market economy doesn’t really exist anywhere among all the countries, what we have instead are a lot of countries that try to find the right balance between letting the market control itself and having the government control the market.

                  So call it whatever you want, but the US does have a mixed economy when placed on that scale.

                  The US gini coefficient is 39.8 as of 2021. Making it one of the worst countries in the world for income inequality.

                  I don’t know how you can say it’s one of the worst when it’s not even in the bottom third in that list of 162 countries.

                  According to that source, the worst country is South Africa with a Gini coefficient of 63.0.

                  The best country is Norway with a Gini Coefficient of 22.7.

                  The US. Ranks 57th with a Gini coefficient of 39.8.

                  If anything that places it in the middle rather than “one of the worst”.

          • neo@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            26 days ago

            You’re downvoted, maybe because people think you promoted the current system (I don’t see that), but what you wrote is technical correct.

            The US has less regulations than it used to have, but there are still rules (e.g. laws against insider trading and stock manipulation, labour laws, consumer and environmental protection etc.).

            Unfortunately the existing rule are being gamed into oblivion and I’m not saying they are sufficient nor do I deny their decline. I’m just saying it could (and maybe will) be worse than now.

      • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        26 days ago

        The fact that regulations make capitalism less dangerous doesn’t mean that capitalism is fine as long as its regulated.

        Hand grenades have a tonne of safety features, but you wouldn’t let your kid play with one. “Safer” isn’t the same thing as “safe”.

        • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          26 days ago

          I’d let my kid play with a grenade. Then again, I don’t have kids by choice, so to imply I had kids would be to imply that at some point something went terribly wrong. But rectified in the most absurd method possible.

          Plus, you couldn’t go to jail for child abuse, because what parent is “double checking” that the grenade he’s playing with is in fact a toy? BECAUSE WHERE THE HELL DOES THIS 3 YEAR OLD GET A GRENADE???

          That logic would track in court. A very sad, very bizzare set of circumstances. That theres no way you could blame the parent for.

        • NotAnotherLemmyUser@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          26 days ago

          What would you propose as being better than the mix of capitalism and socialism that almost every country already has for their economy?

          Both extremes lead to terrible outcomes.

          • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            26 days ago

            Has any country actually TRIED anarchy? I know it sounds terrible on paper, but like…could it possibly be any worse then whatever the fuck north korea is doing? The dictator and his dogs eat very well. Nice beef meals. Whereas the citizens are more like prisoners within a country. Most never even seeing beef because it’s too expensive.

            Would their lives actually be any worse off if there was just no government, no police, no military, no rules, just everybody for themselves?

            Because it kind of seems like they got nothing to lose. It be an amazing case study.

          • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            26 days ago

            “Listen, we already watered down our deadly poison a little and it’s still killing us. Unless you have a better idea we’ll just have to keep drinking deadly poison.”

      • CalcProgrammer1@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        26 days ago

        Radxa as well. I have a Rock Pi 4B running as my home server and it has been a great Pi 4 alternative. I also have an Indiedroid Nova with RK3588S which should be better than the Pi 5 bit the GPU drovers aren’t quite there yet. Once GPU drivers are in it should be an incredible board.

    • Dasnap@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      I got a ‘LePotato’ a few years back when Pi had stock issues, and it worked quite well as a Pi 4 clone.

      • pezmaker@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        27 days ago

        Yep, using one to run clipper for my 3d printer with armbian as the OS. It’s been rock solid for me. There obviously some adaptation and discovery when trying to use the io as it’s similar-but-not the same as the raspberry pi io and manipulating it is not the same. But it works, it was available, it was competitively cheap, and it’s been stable

        Plus I get to say I’m running my 3d printer on a potato

    • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      27 days ago

      There’s tons of similar SBC’s out there from Chinese manufacturers, like Orange Pi, Banana Pi, etc; usually using mediatek RISC-V or rockchip ARM processors. They’re all poorly supported on the software and documentation side though and take more work to get going, which has always been where Raspberry shined- nobody else has made embedded computing so easily accessible with click and go OS options and continuous kernel maintenance.
      Probably the only board closest to software parity is the pine64 boards… but it’s still not quite as good.

      • helenslunch@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        26 days ago

        I don’t really recommend any of them anymore, given how much more powerful and versatile x86 processors are and how much their prices have come down very close to SBC levels…

      • YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        27 days ago

        This is the key point for alternatives. None seem to have the community and support (docs, s/w quality etc) that is remotely close to that of the Raspberry Pi.

        • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          26 days ago

          Guess the community for some of these is about to get much bigger. I’m not in the market for an SBC but this is a big negative against the Pi.

            • Richard@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              26 days ago

              Why could you not run a modern OS after a couple of years? Those SBC manufacturers did not invent an entirely new processor architecture for their computers, you can just generically compile the kernel (plus maybe some slight device tree work).

  • JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    26 days ago

    Raspberry Pi has been over priced for a long time. I’m not saying they’ve been a net positive or negative, but if you think this will make them a bad company then I think they’ve been pretty bad for a bit.

    • morbidcactus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      If you want a SBC, a lepotato works really well, supposed to be more performant than a 3B. I used as an alternate to a raspberry pi for a klipper setup, running armbian on it now.

      There are updated versions of it as well if you need more performance, but they’re cheaper than an equivalent pi and importantly, purchasable which was an issue when I was putting together that printer.

    • bitwaba@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      You can buy some old thinclient lenovos on eBay for super cheap.

      There’s other board manufacturers as well… basically just replace “raspberry” with some other fruit and there’s probably a Pi of it

      I personally think the best thing to do is find a used Celeron laptop and disable the lid switch setting. Now you’ve got a server with a built in UPS.

      Or just fire it up in a docker container because you’re already running Linux right? RIGHT?

      • CO5MO ✨@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        26 days ago

        Haha! Yezzz. Well, I installed Ubuntu in a mid-2014 Macbook pro I acquired. 🤷🏼‍♀️ every comments section seems to have so many users shitting on Ubuntu so idk what is going on

        • bitwaba@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          26 days ago

          Ubuntu (or Canonical, their parent company) has gotten more pushy with their paid service. Personally for me, I’m moving off of Ubuntu to Debian pure systems or Arch because when I ssh to my Ubuntu file server, the MOTD tells me I can pay for some kind of premium service and get 35 additional security updates. So, that’s it. That’s my line in the sand. Don’t advertise to me on my terminal

          (And then there’s all the shit about Snap being installed by default, and I’m just at a point where I only want installed what I want installed, etc)

          But you do you man. If Ubuntu works great for you, stick with it. You may change your mind later down the road, you may not. As long as you’re happy with it right now that all that matters.

    • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      Pi-hole can run on any supported computer+operating system (Linux x64 or ARM based) or in a docker container, you aren’t limited to using an actual Pi.

      • CO5MO ✨@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        26 days ago

        Thanks for the info! Will def check it out! I recently acquired a mid-2014 MacBook Pro & added Ubuntu. Thoughts??

        • TheLemming@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          26 days ago

          As someone running a pihole off an old radio 2B, your MacBook will be more than sufficient to run what is needed. My only advice would be to get an Ethernet adapter if that model doesn’t have one. Losing valid dns queries due to wifi packet loss would be annoying. Beyond that, just google a guide and go, it’s super straightforward to set up and manage.

        • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          26 days ago

          That’d be fine. Laptop cooling fan might die from being on all the time as well as mechanical drive issues at that age but it’s solid hardware otherwise. Pihole is not overly intensive. Ideally make sure the pihole machine is on a wired network connection inside your LAN, because wifi routing latency will be bad otherwise. So that may necessitate a thunderbolt ethernet adapter, but I’ve bodged together much worse before lol.

    • refreeze@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      If you don’t need the GPIO then buy a small form factor office PC like a Dell Optiplex Micro or a Lenovo/HP equivalent. They cost about the same on the used market, are more performant without the ARM headache and use only marginally more power (maybe 5-10w more at idle).

  • Breve@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    26 days ago

    When a company takes on shareholders, whatever goals, mission, or ethos they had is erased. They now exist as a vehicle to make as much money as possible at literally any cost. That’s it. Was nice while it lasted.

    • mindlight@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      Going public introduces shareholders that prioritizes return on investment as opposed to making technology and knowledge about technology accessible for many.

      It doesn’t always end this way but often enough to worry about it…

    • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      Opening up to institutional investment means opening yourself up to ownership by a culture that demands infinite growth. In recent years this has gotten particularly bad; with the rise in interest rates, stocks can no longer deliver moderate growth and still be considered worthwhile investments. Everything is either a rocketship to the moon, or its a sell. Combine that with a string of US court cases that have interpreted tge law in such a way as to foster the belief that its illegal for companies to put anything ahead of shareholder value, and what you get is a top down imperative to squeeze the maximum profit out of everything. When you see Microsoft mulling over ideas like putting ads in your start menu, or EA talking about in-game advertising, this is why. When you see Spotify raising prices multiple times while crowing about how their content production costs are basically non-existent and changing their contracts so that smaller artists literally don’t get paid for their music, this is why.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      27 days ago

      Because the more commercial they get, the more they stray from their original purpose as a charity to provide low-cost machines for kids to learn about computer science.

      First there was the Dynabook, then OLPC, then Raspberry Pi, and now we’ve basically got to start over yet again because enshittification is imminent.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      27 days ago

      There are a high proportion of far-left types on here. I could see them wanting something to be government-owned or something. But wanting a company to be privately-owned rather than publicly-owned seems odd to me.

      And the “enshittification” comments seem odd too.

      “Enshittification” isn’t some sort of catch-all term for a company doing worse. Doctorow coined it to refer to a point where a company that had been losing money to grow a customer base ends the rapid-growth phase and starts monetizing that base.

      That makes business sense for some companies with low marginal costs and high fixed costs, and especially where there is network effect, like social media companies.

      But here, the company is profitable, and not unreasonably so. Like, they don’t have a monetization phase that they need to transition to.

      https://techcrunch.com/2024/06/11/raspberry-pi-is-now-a-public-company-as-its-shares-pops-after-ipo-pricing/?guccounter=1

      In 2023 alone, Raspberry Pi generated $266 million in revenue and $66 million in gross profit.

      Raspberry Pi priced its IPO on the London Stock Exchange on Tuesday morning at £2.80 per share, valuing it at £542 million, or $690 million at today’s exchange rate.

      • Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        27 days ago

        We’re mostly negative on publicly traded companies because their ceo is legally obligated to squeeze blood from a stone or they quite literally will get sued by the shareholders, plenty of examples out there. The exceptions are usually there because the previous owners wrote contracts, etc to help keep the company as it was prior but even then it only works for so long. Check out Ben and Jerry’s and their whole debacle on the subject.

        • tal@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          26 days ago

          There are certain fiduciary obligations that CEOs hold to shareholders. But on the flip side, if someone opposes the transition of privately-owned companies to being publicly-owned, then their position is that only the wealthy, those who can outright own a company rather than only part of it, via shares, may own companies. That seems quite like a policy exceptionally loaded towards the wealthy. It would make capital much harder to get, so it would be harder for someone who wants to start a company to do so. Only very wealthy entities – stuff like very wealthy families – would be able to own companies of any significant size. They would have little competition for their capital, and would be able to demand extremely favorable terms for it. Less-wealthy people would be intrinsically disadvantaged by their inability to must outright buy companies. Less capital availability would tend to impact wages negatively.

          It seems to me stupendously at odds with the sort of thing that I would expect someone on the left end of the spectrum to want.

    • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      They did spend the last few years screwing over any customer that wasn’t some giant corporation on a product that was originally created as a low cost tool for educational purposes.

    • Dasnap@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      Mostly that IPOs put companies into ‘infinite growth mode’ which is obviously impossible, so their product just degrades over time. They can’t just do ‘good enough’ anymore.

      • Neshura@bookwormstory.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        27 days ago

        Also the reason why every company that is consistently ‘good’ is run privately. If you answer to nobody but yourself you have a lot more room for long term plans

    • Addv4@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      Raspberry pi foundation was launched as a charity, and the end goal was to produce a ton of very cheap computers to help children learn about programming. Since then, it has been soo ubiquitous for embedded stuff that for the last couple of years they have basically become unaffordable for the very audience they were intended for. Now they are seeking an ipo because they are used in everything, except as cheap computers for children.

      • ripcord@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        26 days ago

        Are they really used in a bunch of stuff? I still onlt see them included in hobby/homelab/maker/education stuff.

    • The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      Every time a company goes public, they become more and more profitable until the only way to continue on that trajectory is to worsen their own product.

      Think they’ll still be selling the Pico for $4 or the Zero for $15 after they’re reporting to shareholders?

      • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        26 days ago

        Big pharma companies jack up the prices of life saving medicine that’s been affordable for decades and don’t lose a bit of sleep. You bet your ass a hobby electronics company will jack up prices as far as they think they can.

        • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          26 days ago

          Don’t call Raspberry a hobbyist electronics company. Their primary consumer has been business and enterprise customers for years now, industrial/controls companies jumped all over the pi as a super easy drop-in board that can be programmed by any code monkey.
          The Pi hardware shortage of the last few years has mostly been because of this demand, with Raspberry openly saying they were prioritizing bulk corporate orders foe their production volume over hobby consumers. Fuck the little guy, Pi is dead.

        • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          26 days ago

          Price is one thing but the push for returns on investments is massive, this means that it’s time to start cutting corners on everything (except maybe marketing! Yea!). Quality, repairability, and innovation all start to crumble.

    • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      In Tech, an IPO means the business is market ready to be sold off in pieces, ie stocks. The people who buy the product don’t care what it does, they use the product maker as a vehicle to more growth and profit. Typically that means the people who now own the business make poor choices about cost cutting, like off shoring support and removing unuseful documentation while removing people with critical tribal knowledge about processes. Each step the new owner takes will be to make the business more profitable, and in the world of business, the only thing they care about are the numbers and not the environment or people that created those numbers.

  • impure9435@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    27 days ago

    As long as Raspberry Pi doesn’t start ripping off their customers, I will happily stay with them. Most other SBCs are made by Chinese companies, which I definitely won’t buy. Hell no, I’m not supporting the Chinese economy.

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      As long as Raspberry Pi doesn’t start ripping off their customers

      Give it 2 weeks (max) after the IPO

      Hell no, I’m not supporting the Chinese economy.

      Lol, I agree with you, but realistically you probably have only avoided a fraction of Chinese made crap

    • tburkhol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      I don’t so much care where it’s made. The real selling point, to me, for Pi is that their products are well documented, in English, and solutions for problems are easily googled. There’s tons of SBCs out there, some of them even inexpensive, but I can’t tell if any are going to last longer than a single production run. Meanwhile, I can still buy a Pi 3 after almost a decade. Or I can take the hat I made for a Pi3, plug it straight into a new Pi Zero, and expect it to work without changes.

      IPO is a big step down the path to enshittification, especially when there’s no clear, dominant alternative.

  • skybox@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    26 days ago

    Here’s to hoping a solid sbc with gpio pins and solid software support shows up as a competitor to keep them in check?