• atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    They could though! Microsoft has a long history of “embrace, extend, extinguish”!

    You may be willing to put your company at risk because you trust Microsoft but I’m not going to.

    • paf0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Feel free to do you, I have told you this already. Seeing you’re unable to drop the conversation, when did Microsoft ever sue someone for using C#? I trust Microsoft far more than Oracle (reasons detailed in another comment). However, I do not run Microsoft software at my company at this time, other things work better for what I need.

        • paf0@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Give them a few years to change the rules. If their prior love of lawsuits is any indication they will do so soon.

          • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Do you see?? Do you see yet that you’re just now blindly defending a company that has been so anti-open source in its past? A company that has been found guilty of abusing a monopoly? Yet you’re defending them over another company that has also done terrible things??

            You’re approach is so laughably black & white with no nuance that you can’t even see that I’m mocking it by attacking Microsoft with your same terrible logic.

            • paf0@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              No, these are different situations. One openly sued the user’s of their language, the other did not.