True
This likely isn’t far from the truth, “straightness” is very much associated with culture being oppressive/biased against queerness, and most modern theory on the matter concludes that in a vacuum pansexuality, to varying degrees, is the “norm”, and that near-complete heterosexuality and homosexuality are the outliers. Similar thing with monogamy, humans are likely to exhibit non-monogamous behaviours if there’s no cultural influence involved – in fact, humans are the only great apes and one of the very few (in the single digits) simians to be observed participating in monogamy. Pretty much every species that is similar to us is primarily or almost entirely non-monogamous.
Outside of cultural pressures for or against certain sexual behaviours, you generally see pansexual and polygamous tendencies in most of the population – although pansexuality isn’t as common as non-monogamy, in both humans and other primates (but it is still common in apes in general – especially bonobos, who are extremely similar to humans behaviourally and in the most related genus to us, are extremely social even for primates, and who have demonstrated many archaic human behaviours & advancements, even making/utilizing hunting tools like spears and stone tools devoid of any human influence).
Basically, heterosexuality being the norm is likely mostly the product of cultural pressures rather than “nature”. And if we were to somehow magically erase cultural pressures or even the construct of sexuality, most people would exhibit at least somewhat pansexual behaviours, even if they had a strong preference for one sex/gender/whatever the fuck you wanna call it.
I would put my dick in everything in this picture.
🤯
RUN OR HE’LL PUT HIS DICK IN YOUR (blown up) HEAD
I like your style
You’re next.
You’ll get a papercut
You gotta build up them calluses.
This reminds me of a copypasta so vile that I legitimately refuse to read it. I’ve seen and read some fucked up shit, but this one takes the cake. You have been warned.
NSFL
That wasn’t as bad as I thought it would be
I have issues, also do yoiu have this saved on hand even though you never read?🤨
It’s in my screenshots folder and I have read it in the past. I just don’t read it now because I know it would be unpleasant and pointless.
They are going to be transported back to 2001
Here is an alternative Piped link(s):
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I’m open-source; check me out at GitHub.
The stars is a minor you monster.
Even the throne‽
Especially the throne.
“Spiked for their pleasure”, as I always say. Or was that from ScrewJack?
YES
That’s the spirit
I’ll fuck that spirit.
Congress is just a bunch of gay guys trying to gaslight you into making babies so they can have all the gay sex. It’s a deep state conspiracy!
Stick it to the man - literally - and go suck a dick to show those liberals in Washington.
I love the rage bait
It comes off more as edgy than anything.
I mean it’s obviously a joke
It unironically has a point. Straight is a very similar term to whiteness, in that it doesn’t just describe what people literally think it does. Much like how the “white race” isn’t just about skin color, with plenty of pale skinned people being excluded, straight excludes plenty of heterosexual people as well.
If a cis woman dates a man who presents too feminine or a cis man dates a woman who presents too masculine, their straightness is called into question by conservative society. If a cis man dates a trans woman, not straight “because penis.” If a cis person dates an enby, they can literally be heterosexual, but still not qualify as straight for many. If a trans man dates a trans woman, conservatives will twist themselves into pretzels to consider them not straight. If a cishet man gets pegged by his cishet wife, believe it or not, straightn’t.
You might not accept that people believe this, but I didn’t understand how people could see Jews as non-white growing up. I didn’t really get why white people would treat what I saw as other white people like that. Straightness breaks down if you actually look at how people use and think about the term. All notable concepts have loaded connotations that we are often unaware of. That’s just how our brains string together meaning at a neurological level.
Straightness really means that someone isn’t one of those queer people and aren’t attracted to those queer people. It’s why men lose their shit and turn violent if they get attracted to a woman, only to find out that she’s trans. Their straightness is questioned because they fell for a “degenerate removed,” and they fear of becoming a “dirty homo” themselves.
The mere existence of passing trans people and crossdressers makes it impossible for anyone to meet the unrealistic ideal that justifies trans panic as a legal defense. No one on earth can “always tell,” meaning that if you are attracted to the opposite gender at all, there is almost certainly a trans person or crossdresser that you’d be attracted to. The only way to ensure one will not be attracted to trans people is to be ace, meaning no true straight person could ever actually exist.
Well, I didn’t know I needed punk/emo Peach (Bowser?), but I do now.
Bowsette, actually.
