• Varyk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    It’s pretty clear you have blinders on when it comes to mdma, so I understand why you don’t want to believe in the clinical results of a safer, more effective therapy for PTSD symptoms since that clashes with how you feel about MDMA.

    It seems likely Molly will eventually become a less dangerous alternative to even more dangerous medications in dealing with certain symptoms, but I don’t see the point in asking people to wait while we develop a less safe, more complicated therapy when we already have a cost-effective, completely safe and simple therapy available that conclusively treats those symptoms and provides the same benefits more dangerous therapies might provide in the future.

    • treefrog@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      The therapy is already developed and has been being worked on since the '80s.

      It’s just waiting for approval. I don’t understand why you’re being so dense or pushing this point like it’s one or the other.

      They’re both great in their own ways and the research for MDMA and PTSD is way ahead of psilocybin. I showed you in the article I linked above that you just completely dismissed while you continue to post irrelevant articles back.

      I get that you think mushrooms are the cure all for everything but man you really don’t understand the lay of the landscape here. Where it’s at, where it’s been, and what works within the context of Western medicine the best. For PTSD treatment.

      Anyway I’m really done there’s just too much projection in that last post for me to ignore.