alt-text

It blows our hivemind that the United States doesn’t use the ISO 216 paper size standard (A4, A5 and the gang).

Like, we consider ourselves worldly people and are aware of America’s little idiosyncrasies like mass incarceration, the widespread availability of assault weapons and not being able to transfer money via your banking app, but come on - look how absolutely great it is to be European:

The American mind cannot comprehend this diagram

[Diagram of paper sizes as listed below]

ISO 216 A series papers formats

AO

A1

A3

A5

A7

A6

Et.

A4

Instead, Americans prostrate themselves to bizarrely-named paper types of seemingly random size: Letter, Legal, Tabloid (Ledger) and all other types of sordid nonsense. We’re not even going to include a picture because this is a family-friendly finance blog.

Source: Financial Times

    • notthebees@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Zelle is a thing with my banking app.

      My sister has a credit union bank account and her app has it. I have PNC.

    • hOrni@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yes. I can transfer money to someone just by knowing their phone number. I can do it on a Sunday afternoon and they get the money instantly. I haven’t used cash for more than a decade now. Haven’t used a card for at least 5 years.

    • JargonWagon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’ve been able to transfer money through my banking app for a while without issue. Not sure where that came from in the post, cause it’s not true lol.

    • ITGuyLevi@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Not really sure about that one, I’ve been able to transfer money with my banks app for more than a decade. Not all US banks are created equal.

      • Oderus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Not all US banks are created equal

        I think that’s the issue. Also how common direct deposit for paycheques in the US? I hear it’s rare but in Canada, it’s the norm and all our banks here can do e-transfers.

        • ITGuyLevi@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          I’ve had direct deposit for every job since around 2004, before that it was a paper check on payday. Really I signed up for direct deposit after my manager gave me a hard time when I came in to pick up my check on a day I called out sick.

        • acetanilide@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          It’s relatively common, unless you work for a typical cash pay job (usually labor jobs, like construction)

        • JargonWagon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          I’ve had direct deposit at every job I’ve worked for over a decade. Before then, I only had one job that didn’t offer it, though I had friends with jobs that did have direct deposit. Very common to have it these days. Some jobs can even get you direct deposit for the amount you worked that very same day, so I’d work 8 hours and by the time I get home, I’d have my pay from that day, and it’s like that everyday.

          Source: US citizen

    • Stovetop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      The US officially uses the metric system…to define the US customary system of measurements.

      E.g. 1 foot is defined as 0.3048 meters.

      • bluewing@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        That was just ONE aspect of the adoption of the metric system. And that was done to make backwards compatibility easier because of long lasting legacy systems. Because some systems, like say plumbing in a home or city, last for a very long time before they get replaced or repaired. New plumbing installations often use Tubing like PEX which is metric. I designed and fabricated a dozen brackets for a US customer over the weekend for delivery today. They were made using millimeters as specified.

        And if you actually pay attention to how the metric systems compares to the US customary, you would see just how closely they are related from the start. Which makes sense since what we call Imperial measurements predate the metric system by several hundred years.

    • bluewing@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yes, yes we DO use the metric system officially. In the early 1970’s the metric system was made the official standard for weights and measures.

      What we didn’t do was force everyone to use it at 3:11AM 11/21/1974. It was decided to take a longer approach and let the change happen naturally and it has happened.

      Everything in the grocery store is marked with metric weights and volumes. We buy butter by the gram, soda pop by the liter and whisk(e)y buy the milliliter. And everyone is looking for that same missing 10mm socket/wrench. (Where does do those things go anyway?)

      How much more metric do we really need to adopt?

      • harsh3466@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        There must be some invisible 10mm black hole just vacuuming up all the 10mm sockets and wrenches in the world. I can’t even tell you how many damn 10mm sockets and wrenches I’ve bought and I still only have one of each. Probably none. I haven’t needed to wrench anything in a couple weeks.

      • Stovetop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Well, milk is still sold by the gallon, butter is still divided into tablespoons, nutrition facts are still defaulted to cups and ounces. Wood is still sold by the foot or yard, cars still measure speed in miles per gallon, people still know their height and weight in feet and inches and pounds.

        Could be worse but could be a lot better, too.

        • bluewing@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          The gallon of milk makes it incredibly easy to divide it into quarters. That makes it easy to simply double things - 2 pints = 1 quart. 2 quarts = 1/2 gallon. Two 1/2 gallons makes 1 gallon. This dates back to the days when you went to the market and told the seller that you want 1/2 or 1/4 of that container of whatever was in that container. Simple math for simple needs.

          Your 1/4 of a pound of butter or one stick, (again simple divisions for a simple use), is marked with rough marks of tablespoons for cooking if you are using such measurements. But you are quite free to ignore them if you are using a scale. Not really any issue.

          Yes, in the US travel distances are measured in miles. But that slowly becoming meaningless also. People, (no matter the units used to measure the psychical distance), care more about “how long does it take to get there” rather than the actual distance traveled. But, you are free to push a button and switch to kilometers if you choose.

          Measuring height and weight in feet and inches and pounds is pretty much the only thing the medical system uses US Customary for. And I can’t imagine the sheer number of man hours and cost it would take to go back and convert all those medical records to centimeters and kilos. Somethings are just not worth the effort and cost for a minor data point that only matters only as a long term trend. (just like a single blood pressure is a meaningless data point but over a year may reveal a trend or not)

          Each measurement system, US Customary or Metric, has it’s own advantages and disadvantages. To think one is better than the other is a chauvinism based on what you are most familiar with and nothing more.

          • pukeko@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            I mean, a liter is very close to a quart, so it’s not like we’d be asking people to adjust their mindset completely. And ditching US measures means we could finally, once and for all, dispense with the nonsense of having a dry and a wet “cup” measure.

            As for converting records, well, it would be trivial to display a converted value in whatever EMR system a practice uses while noting the values are converted and allowing display of the uncoverted data for validation. (Which brings us to the EMR discussion.)

          • onion@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            The gallon of milk makes it incredibly easy to divide it into quarters

            How did you reach the conclusion that liters can’t be halved or quartered? You could call 250ml a ‘quart’ if you wanted to.

            Metric butter also has markings on it.

            Those medical records should be stored digital anyways, and then it’s a matter of a few man hours to tell the computer to convert them.

            Each measurement system, US Customary or Metric, has it’s own advantages and disadvantages.

            Imo metric can do everything US customary can, but not the other way around, because it’s missing the simple conversions. But that’s it. Everything else is same same but different

        • vaionko@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          cars still measure speed in miles per gallon

          The American system really is something huh

  • pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    idk why the image says “european”, the standard is worldwide. only north america and parts of latin america don’t use it afaik.

  • probablynaked@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    What the fuck, that was way more hilarious than a blog post about financial securities messaging ought to have been

  • BluesF@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    The annoying “letter” paper size is for some unknown reason what windows always sets as the paper size unless I change it to A4 manually. Naturally if I forget the printer won’t print. US paper sizing - annoying me on the other side of the Atlantic.

    • WaterWaiver@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      File I’m printing: A4 PDF
      Default printer setting in Windows: A4
      Default setting on printer itself: A4
      Setting that gets chosen automatically in the print dialog: Letter

    • MetaCubed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Letter paper (8.5" x 11" | 215.9mm x 279.4mm) is kinda sorta pretty close to A4 (8.27" x 11.69" | 210mm x 297mm) so without having the two next to each other, it can seem like A4 is just a funny piece of letter, and vice versa. But to answer the actual question, USA and Canada (and apparently thr phillipines???) use the “North American Standard” which is a terrifying mess in comparison to the beauty that is the ISO standard.

        • activ8r@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          The US is a former British colony, but it doesn’t stop them from doing whatever the hell they want. Utter lunatics…

          I’m sorry, I still haven’t forgiven them for the whole tea thing…

      • criticon@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I think Mexico too, or at least the paper name is “carta” and “oficio” which would translate to letter and legal (kinda)

      • kakes@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Tbf, I can see the use case for some “non-standard” sizes, like Legal, where having more height to the page without the extra width might be useful for readability of long documents.

        …can’t think of an excuse for the rest, though.

    • brbposting@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      We have trouble fitting all our freedom on your kooky, internationally-recognized sizes

      Here’s a comparison using the most sensible units possible:

      • constantokra@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        11x17 is incredibly common too. Usually it is oriented landscape and z folded to get a large diagram into a document. It’s kind of irritating that the most typical large format size is 24x36, which is a different aspect ratio than 11x17, for a variety of reasons. If you’re designing something you need to know what aspect ratio to design for. Most copiers can do 11x17, and if the standard large format size was 22x34 it would be exceedingly easy for most offices to produce good working copies of large documents. Best compromise I’ve seen is when people put a logo or header on the side that can be omitted when you switch aspect ratios.

  • Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Do Euro printers say PC LOAD A4?

    I think they probably do.

    I want to only briefly defend the NA system in terms of naming. I get it, I worked in printing for decades, I know how shitty it all can be. But Letter and Tabloid communicate well for something that is otherwise all the fault of press guys.

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      You really think people are too dumb to remember 2 letter codes that are literally printed on everything? Come on man :D

    • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Well, it’s 2024, so they mostly say things like “out of A4 paper - load A4 paper in tray number 3”. But yeah, they used to.

        • lad@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          TBF, I only remember messages about “out of paper” or “all trays are empty”. Why specify paper size if the printer accepts different ones, anyway?

    • Kerb@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      yes, thats why i always was confused when i heared people online talk about pc load letter.

      i kinda assumed it was just an odd way to refer to paper that some manufacturers used

    • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Well, one still could do it like how many countries transitioned to the metric system: slap the traditional names onto things that are actually now defined by the metric system, like how China’s catty, about 0.60478… kg, became 0.5kg. Just slap “Letter” onto A4.

      • Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        That’s going to make some driver developers very upset. And sensors in printer cartridges that can sense both A4 and Letter.

        I say we just balls the whole thing. Screen or pencils.

        • brisk@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          For technical purposes that need to handle both you can just disambiguate it with “Letter (new)” and “Letter (work or school)”

  • nid_do@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Let’s not even start with the metric system (used everywhere) and the imperial system (used in the usa and some african countries).

    • OrnateLuna@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Don’t let the UK get away with their B’s as well, they use a mix of metric and imperial. Imo that even worse bc at least america is consistent with their bs measuring system

      • LANIK2000@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Americans aren’t consistent either. 2 liter and similar bottles (and it’s not even the same bottle, like they aren’t reusing molds or anything, it’s just an American 2 liter bottle). Sharp edges and points like on mechanical pencils are in millimeters. So are many nuts and bolts. Stuff like electricity and power are measured in metric units. Generally electronics/computer parts are in metric, the main exception that comes to mind is screen size, which even the rest of the world does in inches (LIKE WTF!?!).

        There’s plenty of examples of metric units in the daily life of an American.

      • Denjin@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Most annoying is cars. We buy fuel in litres but measure our cars efficiency in miles per gallon, meaning I either have to calculate how many gallons I put in my car or how many kilometres I’ve driven to work out if I’m being more or less economical.

      • Overshoot2648@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        And Canada. I hate that map of the US and Burma. The US uses metric as it is part of customary units anyway. I also wish metric was base 12 or 16.

    • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      According to wikipedia: “Some imperial measurements remain in limited use in Malaysia, the Philippines, Sri Lanka and South Africa.” - so, not even “some”, just one African country, and limited use.

      • BorgDrone@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Except for the UI.

        During the Apollo program they had very limited computer capacity in the capsule and lander. Computers were huge machines back then and they had to fit one in a spaceship.

        The Apollo computers used metric internally for all calculations. Anything shown to the astronauts however was in imperial, as metric was apparently too complicated for astronauts to comprehend. They had to waste precious computer capacity converting to imperial because even astronauts can’t handle anything else.

  • Sheridan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    fun fact: the length to width ratio of ISO 216, √2:1, is the same ratio as the tritone in an equal tempered 12-tone musical scale. If you fold A4 paper in half, you get a piece of paper with the same length to width ratio as before; analogously, if you invert a tritone, you get another tritone.