• Frank Ring@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Your employer wants you to be in a mindset of scarcity and fear.

    That way, he can have leverage over you and easily control you.

    You should never allow it.

    If you’re being intimidated for termination, look for another job and make it easier for him to fire you.

    Show him that have options and don’t care.

    • Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I got a job at Subway when leaving the army, mostly out of boredom. Told them the only day I cannot come in is Thursdays, that’s when I go into the VA for my deployment issues. Put that is writing, got hired. They also had something like this where you have to always be on call. They called my on Thursday in the middle of a counseling session, so on Friday I was fired.

      Turns out, the FAFO is strong with this one. The VA asked if I put it in writing, “Yes, here is the email”. Several weeks later the fine leveraged against the owner was so high she had to sell the business. She called me, asking when I am coming back in (I could tell it was being recorded, could hear the static) and I laughed and told her you can’t record me, and you fired me, then hung up.

      Turns out shitcanning veterans who just got back from a deployment during the height of “we all love Murica!” gets you zero sympathy from anyone.

        • Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I am fine now. This was a while ago. But thank you for the concern, it is appreciated. I dropped my apron on the floor when leaving and did a “well…bye”.

          The manager said to pick it up.

          “I don’t work here”

  • bufalo1973@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    The appropriate answer to that is the full staff making a chorus and singing to the bosses “FUCK YOUUUUUUUUUUU! WE’RE LEEEEAVING!”

  • SzethFriendOfNimi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Depending on the country/state that could obligate the company to pay for devices if they’re going to require they have them.

    Not to mention possible “on call” pay could apply as well.

    I wonder if people who make these things (if real) even think of throwing them by HR or some professional who could help them avoid the legal implications of these kinds of things.

    • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      This is probably by some small time business owner who never heard of HR, since preventing this liable shit is exactly HR’s job.

    • Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      One would hope that a message THAT tone deaf wouldn’t have even made it to the keyboard before realizing what a catastrophically bad idea it was.

    • ares35@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      there’s a lot of stupid, ignorant assholes running small businesses all over the place that think they own their employees and can boss them 24/7. this could totally be a legit posting somewhere.

      if you want me answering my phone 24/7, you’re paying me 24/7–and providing the phone you want me to answer.

      • sibannac@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’ve seen shit like this working in an understaffed restaurant. It was understaffed because the management decided to drug test and most of the staff was let go. Then whined the entire time about people unable to cover shifts and pulled shit like this. I promptly left after coming back from being sick.

    • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s basically all of the content on r/antiwork after that community decided to throw itself off the golden gate bridge over an awkward interview that didn’t even fucking matter, on Fox “news” of all places

      • Taleya@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        People are still bleating about that interview like it was death of all. Talk about writing the enemy’s propaganda for them…

        • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yeah, I still can’t believe after all this time that people haven’t gained some perspective on that. Like, Fox News viewers were never going to respect an antiwork community regardless.

          I can’t help but think that part of it is based on subconscious transphobia about the mod who gave the interview, especially considering all the blatant misgendering and disproportionate rage directed at them by the community.

          It was a really disturbing outcome, and the interview itself was insignificant compared to the behavior of the users. I’ve never seen such a large community implode over something so small. That was one moment I realized that … maybe I shouldn’t really be on reddit.

          • Taleya@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            I mean the fact that people seem to think that a growing global movement on workers rights was derailed by one debacle of a fox news interview of a reddit mod is…not a good look overall. I legit got attacked on lemmy a couple of days ago for pointing out hey notice how a right wing fuckhead getting pwned doesn’t destroy their reputation? Ya wanna think about that and why you’re doing their propaganda for them?

            it really felt like a purity politics moment. Bug fuck insane when you’re talking about change.

            • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              Yeah, I’ve heard of making a mountain out of a molehill, but this was more like making an anthill into Mt. Everest. And anyone who tried to approach the situation rationally was immediately shouted down by angry mobs. It was hugely disappointing to see.

    • Tash@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah, this is a pretty sad bait for Internet points. The AI BOTs are getting lazy.

      Official company policy being printed and posted on the refrigerator… totally legit. SMH

  • Phegan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Those who work at this company should all no show simultaneously and see how it does.

  • an_onanist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    ‘…voluntary mandatory shift coverage.’

    Someone should be gifted a dictionary for Supervisor Appreciation Day.

    • Farid@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I totally understand the overall ridiculousness of this, but I suspect that “mandatory” and “voluntary” apply to 2 different people in this case. Person 1 has a “mandatory shift” and person 2 is supposed to voluntarily cover that person’s mandatory shift.