• Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      These can genuinely backfire so badly and discourage ridership and the government from ever trying trains again. Failures have hidden costs.

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Considering that stations preceding or proceeding it have good catchment areas, using existing right of ways isn’t the worst idea ever. As for the noise, many places put up sound barriers, that’s a fairly trivial and relatively inexpensive mitigation step.

    The car infrastructure should be blamed for removing catchment space, not the train for being there.

    • Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      the car infratstructure should be blamed

      Sure this is objectively correct, but it’s a rhetorically ineffective take. Most people drive. Most people (less though!) want to continue driving.

      Take the train track project as an opprtunity to re-shape the flow of a neighborhood to suit people rather than… well in many cases, highways literally divide neighborhoods. Using that same right of way is gonna have a lot more costs for a lot less benefit.

      • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Very true, while there is more eventual value in having a station in a connected area, it also leads to more NIMBY-ism for the construction.

        I’m in favour of having mid-highway stations if it means you can more easily build lines that connect the downtown/inner-city with surrounding neighbours before and after the highway section, with a lower chance of vehement opposition and delay from residents from connecting the two.

        One the main lines are built, then it gives a better case for a cross-connecting LRT, subway or train-line that goes through neighbourhoods, rather than scrapping the highway idea and building one neighbourhood line on its own for 15-20 years.

        My previous point mainly stemmed from the Chicago case, where the catchment area was forcibly paved over for the highway.

  • Spzi@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I live about 100m away from a city metro station and I love it. On my way to the station, I walk past:

    • a wellness studio
    • 3 fast food restaurants of different types
    • a bakery
    • a small supermarket
    • a hair studio
    • an ATM
    • about three other businesses which always make me wonder why they exist

    Now I could have this walkable neighborhood or I could walk past six lanes of high speed traffic. And up and down the street I have more destinations to visit or I could count SUVs zooming by on a freeway!

    • Facebones@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I live off of my cities dilapidated ass “”“Main street”“” that runs parallel to the halfa-interstate-A-to-b thing (not sure what it’s called, runs straight down the middle off the real interstate I-81)

      4 lanes of car hell, half car lots/dive bars half empty decaying buildings. They talked about making it 2 lane w/ a center turn lane and expanded ped/bike infrastructure. Got shut down because “I-_____ is always backed up” (it never is) and the BuSiNeSsEs WiLl DiE wItHoUt 4 LanE aCcEsS (even though those same people admit they don’t SHOP at any of said businesses and just use it as an interstate bypass translation: no state cops to bust them for blasting down the strip residents of the area be damned)

    • relevants@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have a 500m walk to my nearest station in a residential area, and my list of places looks very similar:

      • 2 hairdressers and a barber
      • 3 regular restaurants and 2 fast-food places (both Döner lol)
      • 2 bakeries
      • a small supermarket
      • a drug store
      • a pharmacy
      • a bank branch
      • a flower shop
      • a book store
      • a few other shops I’ve never really paid attention to and genuinely couldn’t tell you what they sell

      All of that is there because about half of the apartment buildings have a shop on the ground floor. It’s great, and I don’t even live in a fancy part of the city.

  • UnknownQuantity@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sometimes I travel through a city that has them and everytime when a train zooms by I wonder why are there so many cars on the freeway.

    • Someonelol@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      At least in my case that kind of setup is a somewhat isolated train line with few interconnects with stations that end up too far away from places of interest to the common rider.