• Glowstick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Absolutely, a ten year old computer today is still capable of doing pretty much everything that most people use computers for. It’s not like the old days when every few years a new tier of computer would come out that made older devices no longer capable of doing what people wanted.

      • Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I was still running a Q6600 (a 2.4 gHz quad core from 2007) until a few years ago. It ran most things acceptably for its entire life - it wasn’t until around the time of PS4 Pro/Xbox Whatever ports that it could no longer keep up, and even that was largely due to the other components I was restricted to on such an old motherboard.

        That thing was also a tank. The CPU cooler was stock and the thermal paste had degraded and separated to the point it idled at 65c, but I never had a single hardware fault in nearly fifteen years of running it. I kind of miss it.

        • umbrella@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          i had a q9xxx on an x38. i had it overclocked to keep up and it did no sweat for a good while there.

          by the time i sold it an old computer collector was buying it from me hahaha.

      • Emerald@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        It depends on how good it was to start with. I have a machine from 2006 that is usable for daily tasks. I also have a netbook from 2009 that can barely do anything.

    • thejml@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      One hit 12 before I retired it… and now it’s a network file and web server.