I’ve been using it for a year now and it is giving absolutely phenomenal search results right now.

For those that don’t know what it is, it’s a paid search engine - $54 per year for 300 searches a month. You get what you pay for, that’s for sure. They used to have a free tier, but I think you can still search for free a couple of times to try it out.

  • Asudox@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I was usimg Kagi a few months ago. Then I started selfhosting a SearXNG instance. I love the customizability. I dislike how they are also getting into AI just like other big tech.

    Self hosting is better than using someone else’s product. I also want to self host my email, but they say it’s a pain in the ass and hard to maintain.

  • barcaxavi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    300 searches/month feels tight for my use case. How do you manage? Are you using something else for search?

    I’m using DDG and I’m ok with it, every one out two time a month I check Google results for some topic, and DDG seems to do well.

    • Kashif Shah@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      After using the trial for a month and reaching the limit, i decided to pay for the $108/yr unlimited searches.

      Kagi did statistical analysis before assigning pricing (it was a long process that they would update us on while they gave us leniency on the quotas). They found that 300 per month was the sweet spot for a lot of regular people that might only search a few times a week or others that might only occasionally do deep dives.

      edit: fixed an error, but also adding: no, i exclusively use kagi now on all my devices. give it a test run, it is dramatically different from ddg and googhell

  • Susaga@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Sorry, I’m still struggling with how you paid $54 for a search engine, and you still only got 300 searches a month. 10 a day. That’s just terrible.

    Meanwhile, duck duck go is free and unlimited.

  • souperk@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I am trying it out, got a subscription a couple of weeks ago. I went to unlimited searches right away since on a work day I heavily rely on search engines.

    To be honest, I have nothing to say about it, which feels like a good thing considering that lately I have been complaining a lot about Google.

    • Kashif Shah@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Awesome, that’s exactly the type of feedback from a professional that I was looking for - I feel almost exactly the same.

      Other than I feel a little bit fanboy-ish now lol.

    • Kashif Shah@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Wrong, retired software engineer here.

      Some people use search for more than finding recipes and google has been sucking at professional search for a while now, as has been repeatedly reported at Hacker News

  • Alborlin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    How do you justify paying

    1. For searches , cause i think it’s fundamental such as how to fix bathroom leak or even specific name of generic OTC medicine, it’s so trivial
    2. Consider if you do search for trivial things how don manage only with 300 searches ? When I am lookig for something’s specific it takes multiple searches within hour , what would do then ?
    • Kashif Shah@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      heh, you should see it now - they’ve expanded the features.

      i’ll take a look at the controversy, thanks.

      edit: skimmed it, looks like contrived controversy to me - a rather unprofessional software reviewer that isn’t willing to engage with their subject? no thanks… but to each their own.