• lorkano@lemmy.worldEnglish
      0·
      5 months ago

      Banning AI answers was reasonable though. People were posting were too many not verified and incorrect code snippets that entire quality of the platform would decrease. AI still makes more mistakes than humans that provide responses on stack.

    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.worldEnglish
      0·
      5 months ago

      That exactly tracks. You can’t feed answers from an AI into an AI. It gets all incesty (technical term). So they have to ban user submitted AI answers.

    • OuterRem@lemmy.mlEnglish
      0·
      5 months ago

      Were they trying to avoid having AI produced output sold as LLM input along with their human user generated content? I wonder if this was some big picture decision or pure coincidence.

    • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.worldEnglish
      0·
      5 months ago

      Me: How would I write a for-loop that starts from the end of a list?

      ChatGPT: Closing this conversation as this question has already been answered.

      • turmacar@lemmy.worldEnglish
        0·
        5 months ago

        The working solution being 5 child comments deep on a wrong solution flagged as correct is my favorite.

  • some pirate@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
    0·
    5 months ago

    Chatgpt: How do I kill all the children in this thread?

    As a AI model I’m not allowed to promote violence against… Also since children are involved this case was reported to your local enforcement agency

    • Xirup@yiffit.netEnglish
      0·
      5 months ago

      Does ChatGPT can really report you in case you say something like this? Is it just a threat or can it really become more?

        • mako@lemmy.todayEnglish
          0·
          5 months ago

          It would take a super genius to understand that they’re either a non-native English speaker or made a simple typo/autocorrect issue. Also, since it’s completely impossible to even guess at the point they’re trying to make through the context of every other word in their comment we all owe you a debt of gratitude for calling this out!

          Thank you, corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca, for adding something incredibly meaningful to the conversation and the world as a whole!

          Oh no… I just saw this comment in a different thread from 2 hours ago, and it MAKES NO SENSE:

          Doctors today face a demand form their services that, while we can’t guarantee will get them.jigher wages, can give them more leeway against unwritten political rules of speech.

          What is a doctor’s “demand form?” And “them.jigher” isn’t a term I could find anywhere on the internet! I don’t understand what the author, corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca, was trying to say! It’s all just gibberish! I feel good calling it out though. I’m sure that corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca will be grateful for my much-needed help and not think I’m a dick for detracting from their point to assert my knowledge of English grammar over them.

      • merc@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
        0·
        5 months ago

        Chat GPT generates plausible auto-complete text. If it has been trained on saying “this case was reported to your local law enforcement agency”, those are the kinds of words it might spit out.

    • lemmyvore@feddit.nlEnglish
      0·
      5 months ago

      Are we sure this deal is about answering new SO questions with LLM? It’s more likely to be a deal where SO sells access to its database to OpenAI so they can use human-generated content for LLM training, and SO gets to use LLM as a more efficient search through its human-generated content.

      It’s possible they could also choose to delegate the duplicate decision to the LLM but let’s be honest, that decision is currently crap anyway.

      • andrew@lemmy.stuart.funEnglish
        0·
        5 months ago

        I think the joke is that the AI trained on SO data to the point that duplicate, similar, or common questions would get this treatment. Since that’s common enough on SO to be a meme.

      • bus_factor@lemmy.worldEnglish
        0·
        5 months ago

        Yeah, that was my assumption as well. I wonder how they’re going to work around that SO is getting spammed with AI-generated answers, though. You really don’t want your LLM cannibalizing itself.

      • Tryptaminev@lemm.eeEnglish
        0·
        5 months ago

        Have you tried using Windows 11 instead of your weird Linux distro? Windows 11 is the best Operation system in the market, by the greatest software company Microsoft. It features the best user experience, not only removing all those complicated settings from your grasp but providing you with suggestions tailored just for you!

        • jnk@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
          0·
          5 months ago

          …Did you just speculated a terrifyingly credible AI-generated Microsoft ad disguised as genuine tech support?

          Confusing realization here

          Isn’t that like an AI ad about AI and ads?

          • Tryptaminev@lemm.eeEnglish
            0·
            5 months ago

            I think it is important to value and respect everyone’s OS choices. I have made great experiences with using the latest AI tools that OpenAI and Microsoft provided and continue to improve every day. I can understand that people might be skeptical of AI at first, because it is a new and complicated technology. Windows 11 shows that you don’t need to understand every detail about it. You can use AI to make your life easier by just talking to it like it is your best friend. Using a computer never has been easier.

    • merc@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
      0·
      5 months ago

      Attribution — You must give appropriate credit

      So, if Stack Overflow generates text based on any answer (or question) in Stack Overflow’s DB, it must credit the person whose text it adapted.

      Good luck with that…