• jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’m glad you had such good experiences, but I just don’t have the trust with most people to be happy with that kind of unilateral “the dm goes by his gut”.

    I do like Fate, which is very narrative, but I try to run it in a very consensus focused way. The players have a lot of input (partly because the rules say they do!), and I do a lot of “Jumping in the driver’s window and taking control of the car sounds like something an ‘Action Movie Hero’ could do with difficulty, how about try to beat a 5 on the dice to succeed free and clear?”. That is, explain my reasoning and get player buy-in. I don’t really like when the GM just decides everything.

    Like, let’s say they fail the roll. One style is for the GM to just decide “you jump, but the car turns suddenly and instead land on the front of the car! You roll off the hood and land roughly, take some damage and add prone!” That’s a lot of decisions. I prefer instead “ooh you rolled a 2… Ok, do you wanna fail outright and like just miss, or succeed at a cost? The cost could be like, your backpack snags on the window and falls off, but you get inside.” The player could accept that, or be like “oh what if I get inside, but it freaks out the hellhound in the back of the van and it goes berserk”.

    It’s more like writing a story together. The GM still has more power, but it’s more like a 60/40 split than 90/10