• jeffw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Let’s highlight the actual points in this article instead of taking Hexbear at their word:

    emphasizing that violent protest is not protected under the law.

    Biden emphasized that “peaceful protest is in the best tradition of how Americans respond to consequential issues”

    “Whether it’s antisemitism, Islamophobia or discrimination against Arab Americans or Palestinian Americans, it’s simply wrong… In America, we respect the right and protect the rights for them to express that, but it doesn’t mean anything goes. It needs to be done without violence, without distraction, without hating and within the law.”

    The president also said “no” to a separate shouted question asking whether he thinks the National Guard should intervene in the campus protests.

    To summarize, he respects their right to protest and called for nonviolence without citing any side in particular. Notable that there have been violent counter-protestors.

    • Deinonych[they/them]@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Whithout citing any side in particular.

      Do you really think Biden is talking about anyone other than the pro-Palistinian protesters in this context?

    • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Ok, but protests need to be done “without distraction”? That kind of defeats the purpose, doesn’t it?

      • Omega@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        I think he meant to stay on point. As in, don’t fall into antisemitism when you’re protesting Israel. Since that’s what he mentioned just before.

      • Amerikan Pharaoh@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Since there’s more than one of you ignorant settler narcissists replying to the above comment to the tune of “as long as I’m not inconvenienced…”, I’m not taking the time to respond to all of you individually: WHAT DO YOU THINK THE POINT OF A PROTEST IS, YOU COMFORTABLE SUBURBANITE COLONOIDS? THE POINT IS TO BE SEEN! THE POINT IS TO DRAW ATTENTION TO AN INJUSTICE!

        Now it shouldn’t surprise me that the sons and daughters of Kent State’s protestors have this take, but it disgusts me; because y’all wanna talk all this bullshit about failures of civics classes when your blueanon genocidairés fail to get the votes you think they’re automatically entitled to, then you’ll say some bullshit like “I’m against any protest I can’t ignore”. I hope you keep that same energy when it’s your face the government is forcing its boot down on; 'cause I’ll be dead by then-- and if I wasn’t? I’d laugh at you. I’d make jokes at your expense. I’d spit on your cause as I walked by. Finally, after all that got boring, I’d ignore you. THE EXACT SAME WAY Y’ALL DO RIGHT NOW.

        Death to the settlers. John Brown should’ve killed more slavers; maybe we’d have less settler treatbrains to deal with in the here-and-now.

      • fossphi@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        As long as I’m not inconvenienced, you can keep doing your protests

      • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Violence begins with cops or fascist agitators*. So far the students have had the discipline to not retaliate, which is what the violent agitators want.

        *Some of those who work forces…

    • Amerikan Pharaoh@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      No one cares about the uninformed, State-Department-regurgitation you call an ‘opinion’ except for other uninformed settler wastrels sipping the same governmental vomitus, you collaborating dog.

    • Pollux@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Translation: We only allow “protests” that are ineffective and don’t cause any trouble for the ruling class

      Also, Lemmy.world user detected, opinion rejected.

    • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Peaceful protests have not won anything. The Civil Rights Movement was not peaceful, despite liberal mythology.

    • fah_Q@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Name anything significant that changed with “peaceful protest” shit nothing changes when right-wing nut jobs stormed Congress.

    • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Every single one of the US’s amendments came not through voting, or within the political system itself. Every single one was accompanied by violent and disruptive protest and the threat from the masses below.